2017
DOI: 10.1111/aec.12549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Edge effects on small mammals: Differences between arboreal and ground‐dwelling species living near roads in Brazilian fragmented landscapes

Abstract: Habitat fragmentation often induces edge effects that can increase, decrease or have minimal effect upon the population density of a species, depending upon environmental conditions and the requirements of the species. Using a trapping study and generalized linear mixed models, we evaluated edge effects on small tropical mammals living near roads, including two ground-dwelling (Akodon sp. and Cerradomys subflavus) and two arboreal (Marmosops incanus and Rhipidomys sp.) species. We examined the relationship of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, interior trees had a greater dbh (defined as diameter at breast height) than edge trees in a fragmented rainforest in Costa Rica [5]. Similar results were reported in Brazilian fragmented landscapes, with the basal area of trees being lower in proximity to the edge [6]. In contrast, the density of some woody species was higher near the edge in Morogoro Region, Tanzania [7].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For example, interior trees had a greater dbh (defined as diameter at breast height) than edge trees in a fragmented rainforest in Costa Rica [5]. Similar results were reported in Brazilian fragmented landscapes, with the basal area of trees being lower in proximity to the edge [6]. In contrast, the density of some woody species was higher near the edge in Morogoro Region, Tanzania [7].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…No spatial variations in edge-related abundance were observed in some Neotropical primate species [5,11]. However, edge responses of mammals are not always stable across landscapes [6], an insight which resulted from a long-term fragmentation study in the Amazon region and was incorporated in the "landscape-divergence-hypothesis" [14]. This hypothesis states that as a consequence of high local landscape and weather dynamics, sites from different landscapes will diverge more over time (in species composition and possibly ecosystem functioning) than sites from the same landscape.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Mining areas are often located near protected areas (PAs) (Durán et al, 2013) or within intact landscapes (Kobayashi et al, 2014; Plumptre et al, 2019), which can concentrate effects in or near areas of high conservation value and may detract from their goals (World Bank, 2019a, 2019b). Where such development occurs, landscapes are subject to fragmentation (da Rosa et al, 2018; Rabanal et al, 2010) and degradation (Munguia‐Rosas et al, 2014; World Bank, 2019b). Fragmentation due to development is perhaps the greatest threat to natural systems (da Rosa et al, 2018; Guo et al, 2018; Plumptre et al, 2019) in Africa (Attua et al, 2018; Laurance et al, 2006), a situation made worse by weak governance (Salum et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%