2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jctb.2011.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Edge-disjoint Hamilton cycles in graphs

Abstract: In this paper we give an approximate answer to a question of Nash-Williams from 1970: we show that for every α > 0, every sufficiently large graph on n vertices with minimum degree at least(1/2 + α)n contains at least n/8 edge-disjoint Hamilton cycles.More generally, we give an asymptotically best possible answer for the number of edge-disjoint Hamilton cycles that a graph G with minimum degree δ must have. We also prove an approximate version of another long-standing conjecture of Nash-Williams: we show that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
76
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(26 reference statements)
3
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar calculation to Claim 2 shows that E [N a,b ] = (1 ± 4ǫ) np 4 2 , and a similar concentration argument shows that N a,b is within ǫ · np 4 2 of its mean with probability 1 − o(n −3 ). Therefore, a union bound over all a, b completes the proof of this final claim, and the proof of Lemma 3.4 At this point, we could immediately apply the results of Section 3.1 to pack Γ with perfect matchings, which then correspond to Hamilton cycles in D. However, it is unfortunate that this would miss most of the edges of D, since not all edges of D are in correspondence with edges of Γ.…”
Section: Proof By Construction γ Is a Bipartite Graph With Partssupporting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A similar calculation to Claim 2 shows that E [N a,b ] = (1 ± 4ǫ) np 4 2 , and a similar concentration argument shows that N a,b is within ǫ · np 4 2 of its mean with probability 1 − o(n −3 ). Therefore, a union bound over all a, b completes the proof of this final claim, and the proof of Lemma 3.4 At this point, we could immediately apply the results of Section 3.1 to pack Γ with perfect matchings, which then correspond to Hamilton cycles in D. However, it is unfortunate that this would miss most of the edges of D, since not all edges of D are in correspondence with edges of Γ.…”
Section: Proof By Construction γ Is a Bipartite Graph With Partssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…From (a), there are (1 ± 5ǫ) np 4 2 such quadruples. The probability that a given quadruple is completely labeled by i is [(1 ± 1.03ǫ)κ] −4 by (b), so the expected codegree in Γ ′ i is (1 ± 10ǫ) n 2 p κ 4 .…”
Section: For Eachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We let VVfalse(Gfalse) be such that false|Vfalse|1 and false|V(G)Vfalse| is even. The difference is that we now apply the following result of to each Gc:=Gcfalse[V(G)Vfalse] to obtain the desired matchings Mic: for every α>0, any sufficiently large n‐vertex graph with minimum degree δ(1/2+α)n contains at least (δαn+n(2δn))/4 edge‐disjoint Hamilton cycles.…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result in general cannot be improved: Indeed, for δ>1/2 the number of edges of the densest regular spanning subgraph of G is close to false(δ+2δ1false)n2/4 (see ). So the bound in (iii) is asymptotically optimal, for example, if n is even and scriptH consists of Hamilton cycles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%