2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-017-5127-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Edge detection: a review of dissimilarity evaluations and a proposed normalized measure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(67 reference statements)
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, k = 2 for [21,22] Symmetric distance [3,5] [29] Γ(G t , D c ) = FP+FN |Gt| 2 · ∑ p∈Dc d 2 Gt (p) None Complete distance measure [6] Ψ(G t , D c ) = FP+FN |Gt| 2 · ∑…”
Section: Appendix Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, k = 2 for [21,22] Symmetric distance [3,5] [29] Γ(G t , D c ) = FP+FN |Gt| 2 · ∑ p∈Dc d 2 Gt (p) None Complete distance measure [6] Ψ(G t , D c ) = FP+FN |Gt| 2 · ∑…”
Section: Appendix Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various evaluation methods have been proposed in the literature to assess different shapes of edges using pixel-based ground truth (see reviews in [1], [2], [3], [4]). Indeed, a supervised evaluation criterion computes a dissimilarity measure be-tween a ground truth (G t ) and a detected contour map (D c ) of an original image I.…”
Section: On Existing Normalized Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various edge detection evaluations involving confusion matrices have been developed , cf. [3] [4]. The Dice measure [10] is one well known example:…”
Section: On Existing Normalized Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations