2015
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1506.04141
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Edge Detecting New Physics the Voronoi Way

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the purpose of quantifying the correlations, we introduce an Ising spin lattice with suitably defined nearestneighbor spin-spin interactions (alternative approaches rely on neural-networks [34,35] or wavelet transforms 1 There are alternative approaches which try to avoid (to varying degrees) the reliance on a background prediction from Monte Carlo. These include traditional bump-hunting methods, edge detection techniques [16,17] and recent machine-learning based approaches [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. However, given the spectacular success of the SM in describing current data, its theoretical prediction of the background is well under control and should not be ignored.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the purpose of quantifying the correlations, we introduce an Ising spin lattice with suitably defined nearestneighbor spin-spin interactions (alternative approaches rely on neural-networks [34,35] or wavelet transforms 1 There are alternative approaches which try to avoid (to varying degrees) the reliance on a background prediction from Monte Carlo. These include traditional bump-hunting methods, edge detection techniques [16,17] and recent machine-learning based approaches [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. However, given the spectacular success of the SM in describing current data, its theoretical prediction of the background is well under control and should not be ignored.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 we take n to be relatively low, n = 4. This allows us to find the minimum energy H min by brute force, i.e., by inspecting each of the 2 N = 2 16 comparing the corresponding energies. Then in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, instead of looking for an excess in the signal region P SR , we shall follow up on the idea of Refs. [16,17] to target directly the boundary ∂P N P of the NP phase space region P N P , by using the fact that the combined distribution (1.2) is non-differentiable anywhere on ∂P N P where f N P is non-vanishing. As it turns out, the latter is a very safe assumption -if anything, f N P is not only non-vanishing, but often enhanced and even singular on the boundary ∂P N P [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it turns out, the latter is a very safe assumption -if anything, f N P is not only non-vanishing, but often enhanced and even singular on the boundary ∂P N P [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. Since the background distribution f SM is a smooth function across ∂P N P , the presence of f N P creates a discontinuous "jump" in the combined event density (1.2), precisely at the location of the boundary ∂P N P [16,17]. We can thus reformulate the original problem of finding evidence of NP in the collider data as follows:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation