2021
DOI: 10.23919/jcc.2021.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Edge computing-based joint client selection and networking scheme for federated learning in vehicular IoT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [35], the authors have studied FL in a VEC scenario and have proposed an approach for selecting the best quality models during the training phase for tackling the diverse data quality and corresponding information asymmetry issue of the FL process. An edge computing-based joint client selection and networking scheme for vehicular IoT is presented in [36]. The importance of the trade-off between the accuracy of the global model and the communication overhead of FL in vehicular environments is also highlighted.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [35], the authors have studied FL in a VEC scenario and have proposed an approach for selecting the best quality models during the training phase for tackling the diverse data quality and corresponding information asymmetry issue of the FL process. An edge computing-based joint client selection and networking scheme for vehicular IoT is presented in [36]. The importance of the trade-off between the accuracy of the global model and the communication overhead of FL in vehicular environments is also highlighted.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the framework lacks an analysis of the loss and accuracy incurred in training the network model data. Bao et al (2021) used distributed approaches to designate some vehicles as edge vehicles and used the edge vehicles as federated learning clients for local model training, resulting in an efficient deep learning network architecture. Also, Zhao et al (2020) advanced federated learning and local differential privacy (LDP), as well as four LDP mechanisms to scramble the gradients generated by the vehicles, to provide high accuracy with a small privacy budget.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, Zhao et al (2020) advanced federated learning and local differential privacy (LDP), as well as four LDP mechanisms to scramble the gradients generated by the vehicles, to provide high accuracy with a small privacy budget. The literature ( Pokhrel & Choi, 2020b ; Bao et al, 2021 ; Zhao et al, 2020 ) amply illustrates that the combination of vehicular networking and federated learning can be a solution to the problem of isolated data islands in the IoV. Although the models in the literature can improve the training accuracy of the network models, the global models are susceptible to noise data, leading to biases that make the global models inefficient to learn and slow to converge.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An algorithm of weighted zero-forcing precoding is used by each of UAV to mitigate the interference to the FL server. Bao et al 8 proposed an edge computing-based joint client selection and networking scheme for vehicular IoT, where some of vehicles are assigned to act as both edge nodes (aka cluster centers) and FL clients via a distributed approach. The selected clients play a role of forwarders between common vehicles and FL server.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6 Recent 2 years have begun to witness an increasing interest in studying how to employ FL on mobile ad hoc networks (MANET) or multi-agent systems (MAS), such as unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), 7 and vehicular Internet of Things (IoT). 8 Nevertheless, these mobile devices acting as FL clients are designed to directly communicate with an FL server (or a cluster center that plays a role in relaying), rather than an ad hoc operation mode. This situation is also present when FL is applied to wireless sensor networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%