2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Edge chipping resistance and flexural strength of polymer infiltrated ceramic network and resin nanoceramic restorative materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
37
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(17 reference statements)
2
37
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies showed greater 3‐point flexural strength values for the nanoceramic resin when compared with PICN. Argyrou et al showed no statistical difference between the mean values of the nanoceramic resin (170 MPa) and a leucite reinforced glass–ceramic (159 MPa), both presenting greater values compared with PICN (124 MPa) and feldspathic ceramic (120 MPa). Choi et al also found greater values of 3‐point flexural strength for the nanoceramic resin (159.1 MPa) when compared with PICN (140.1 MPa).…”
Section: Mechanical and Adhesive Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Other studies showed greater 3‐point flexural strength values for the nanoceramic resin when compared with PICN. Argyrou et al showed no statistical difference between the mean values of the nanoceramic resin (170 MPa) and a leucite reinforced glass–ceramic (159 MPa), both presenting greater values compared with PICN (124 MPa) and feldspathic ceramic (120 MPa). Choi et al also found greater values of 3‐point flexural strength for the nanoceramic resin (159.1 MPa) when compared with PICN (140.1 MPa).…”
Section: Mechanical and Adhesive Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…However, PICN showed lower values compared with lithium disilicate glass–ceramic (IPS e.max: 271.6 MPa) and greater values than feldspathic porcelain (Mark II: 137.8 MPa) . Other studies showed greater 3‐point flexural strength values for the nanoceramic resin when compared with PICN. Argyrou et al showed no statistical difference between the mean values of the nanoceramic resin (170 MPa) and a leucite reinforced glass–ceramic (159 MPa), both presenting greater values compared with PICN (124 MPa) and feldspathic ceramic (120 MPa).…”
Section: Mechanical and Adhesive Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Ao avaliar o desempenho quanto à resistência e rigidez à flexão, será possível um melhor conhecimento de aspectos da fratura deste tipo de material, do módulo de elasticidade, da repetibilidade da tensão de ruptura dos mesmos (quantificada pelo módulo de Weibull, Argyrou, (2015). Assim como uma avaliação da economia obtida no custo final da matéria prima, que poderá justificar, ou não, o aumento de custo relativo ao retorno das peças já utilizadas pelo consumidor, bem como o reaproveitamento de peças defeituosas geradas dentro do processo produtivo normal.…”
Section: -Aspectos Do Comportamento Mecânico Do Mármore Sintéticounclassified