2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10841-016-9928-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Edge and land use effects on dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) in Brazilian cerrado vegetation

Abstract: particularly in landscapes with a pasture matrix. However, this land use disrupts the species composition of communities, indicating that communities located in cerrado and pasture have a distinct species composition, and that both communities are afected by edge distance. Thus, anthropogenic land uses may severely afect dung beetles, and this impact can extend to communities located in cerrado remnants as well as to those in matrices, with possible consequences for ecological processes such as decomposition a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
30
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
1
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Biologically, our results reveal that, for managed Eucalyptus plantation, 28 years of abandonment were not enough for the ant communities to recover the characteristics of those found in native forests. Studies with others organism, such as dung beetles 54 , 56 , lizards 57 , or arachnids 58 , also suggest that communities in native forest differ not just from plantations forests, but also from secondary or restored forests, demonstrating the uniqueness of primary forests and the importance of maintaining these habitats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biologically, our results reveal that, for managed Eucalyptus plantation, 28 years of abandonment were not enough for the ant communities to recover the characteristics of those found in native forests. Studies with others organism, such as dung beetles 54 , 56 , lizards 57 , or arachnids 58 , also suggest that communities in native forest differ not just from plantations forests, but also from secondary or restored forests, demonstrating the uniqueness of primary forests and the importance of maintaining these habitats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the MTZ, other studies have also found that grazing areas have a positive effect on dung beetle abundance and diversity at high elevations and in dry environments, specifically in pine–oak forest and semiarid scrubland (Barragán et al, 2014) and JF (Ortega-Martínez, Moreno & Escobar, 2016) of the Sierra Madre Oriental province. Similarly, dung beetle abundance is higher in human-created pastures than in native savannah-like vegetation in the Cerrado ecosystem in Brazil, and the influence of the edge is evident only for abundance when landscape matrix is pastureland (Martello et al, 2016). Thus, the presence of cattle may have a positive effect on dung beetle abundance, probably due to higher resource availability (dung), but very intensive grazing may reduce their diversity (Hutton & Giller, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the potential of mandatory forest restoration to provide both watershed services and biodiversity conservation, the Native Vegetation Protection Law of 2012, which replaced the 1965 Forest Code, strongly reduced the minimum width of riparian corridors that must be restored along streams and around springs in Brazil (Soares-Filho et al., 2014). The restoration of thin corridors, which are more susceptible to edge effects (Martello, Andrioli, de Souza, Dodonov, & Ribeiro, 2016; Mendes, Ribeiro, & Galetti, 2015), may provide less functional connectivity of the landscape and thus suboptimal levels of biodiversity conservation services (Brancalion, Garcia, et al., 2016a; Rotta, Viani, & Rosario, 2016). In conclusion, there is great potential for incorporating biodiversity conservation objectives into projects primarily designed and funded for improving the provision of water-related ES, a potential that can be optimized by adopting a landscape ecology perspective in the planning and implementation of ecological restoration efforts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%