2003
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.10690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eddy current correction in diffusion‐weighted imaging using pairs of images acquired with opposite diffusion gradient polarity

Abstract: In echo-planar-based diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), the evaluation of diffusion parameters such as apparent diffusion coefficients and anisotropy indices is affected by image distortions that arise from residual eddy currents produced by the diffusion-sensitizing gradients. Correction methods that coregister diffusion-weighted and non-diffusion-weighted images suffer from the different contrast properties inherent in these image types. Here, a postprocessing correction sch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
144
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
144
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DTI quantification was preceded by eddy current correction on a slice-by-slice basis by withinslice registration, which takes advantage of the symmetry of the opposing polarity acquisition (Bodammer et al, 2004). The reversing diffusion gradient polarity scheme also allowed for compensation of the diffusion effect created by the imaging gradients by averaging the opposite polarity data (Neeman et al, 1991), reducing the data to six non-collinear diffusion-weighted images per slice.…”
Section: Dti Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DTI quantification was preceded by eddy current correction on a slice-by-slice basis by withinslice registration, which takes advantage of the symmetry of the opposing polarity acquisition (Bodammer et al, 2004). The reversing diffusion gradient polarity scheme also allowed for compensation of the diffusion effect created by the imaging gradients by averaging the opposite polarity data (Neeman et al, 1991), reducing the data to six non-collinear diffusion-weighted images per slice.…”
Section: Dti Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total of 24 diffusion-weighted measurements, each an average of four measurements, were divided into four blocks, each preceded by a non-diffusion-weighted acquisition. The DTI images were eddy current corrected according to the correction scheme developed by Bodammer et al (2004), followed by a correction for head motion on the basis of the non-diffusion-weighted images using the AIR software package (Woods et al, 1998). Diffusion tensors were calculated for each voxel by singular value decomposition and then decomposed into eigenvalues and eigenvectors.…”
Section: Diffusion Tensor Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12-15 Residual gradients arising from long-term Eddy currents can also be corrected by reversing diffusion-weighting gradients to estimate the symmetry of distortions through a cross-correlation approach. 16 Finally, Bammer et al 17 developed a method to estimate and correct errors relating to gradient spatial uniformity and linearity using an isotropic water phantom.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%