As mesoscale oceanic eddies, they have potential long-range ability of dragging along various types of tracers (e.g., nutrients, salinity, larvae) (Robinson, 1983), and, in particular, Sargassum rafts (Beron-Vera & Miron, 2020). The argument of Huang et al. (2021) is based on the tracking of Eulerian footprints of mesoscale vortices on satellite-altimetry gridded maps of sea-surface height (SSH) anomaly (Schlax & Chelton, 2016) and absolute dynamic topography (Rio et al., 2011). Here we question Huang et al. (2021) results based on theoretical arguments, specialized SSH data analysis, and observations by Fratantoni and Richardson (2004) of satellite-tracked surface drifters and submerged floats, which show that they hardly traverse the Lesser Antilles. The main issue with the analysis by Huang et al. ( 2021) is its observer-dependent nature. We reiterate below, one more time, the issue with the Eulerian, streamline-based analysis carried out by Huang et al. (2021), no matter how sophisticated it is made (e.g., through lagged correlations and the construction of Hovmöller plots of stitched fields on one side and of the other of the Lesser Antilles) or how arbitrary it is framed (e.g., by following a particular isoline of SSH).Consider the velocity field u(x, t) = (x sin 4t + y(2 + cos 4t), x(cos 4t − 2) − y sin 4t), where 𝐴𝐴 𝐱𝐱 = (𝑥𝑥𝑥 𝑥𝑥) ∈ ℝ 2 denotes position and 𝐴𝐴 𝐴𝐴∈ ℝ is time, which represents an exact linear solution of the two-dimensional Navier-Stokes equation (Haller, 2005). The flow streamlines are closed at all times suggesting an elliptic structure, that is, a vortex. Moreover, the most common Eulerian criteria (Q, λ 2 , Δ, swirling strength, etc., cf. Haller ( 2005))