2004
DOI: 10.1186/gb-2004-6-1-r7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: The Mammalian Phenotype Ontology as a tool for annotating, analyzing and comparing phenotypic information

The Mammalian Phenotype (MP) Ontology enables robust annotation of mammalian phenotypes in the context of mutations, quantitative trait loci and strains that are used as models of human biology and disease. The MP Ontology supports different levels and richness of phenotypic knowledge and flexible annotations to individual genotypes. It continues to develop dynamically via collaborative input from resea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
203
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 348 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(10 reference statements)
2
203
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At least two kinds of phenotype ontologies can be distinguished: ontologies in which each term contains one specific phenotypic trait (Robinson et al , 2008; Smith et al , 2004), and ontologies and methods that permit the composition of a term through the combination of an entity and a quality (Gkoutos et al , 2004a, b; Mungall et al , 2010). Each of these approaches describes a phenotype through qualities that are attributes of an entity .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At least two kinds of phenotype ontologies can be distinguished: ontologies in which each term contains one specific phenotypic trait (Robinson et al , 2008; Smith et al , 2004), and ontologies and methods that permit the composition of a term through the combination of an entity and a quality (Gkoutos et al , 2004a, b; Mungall et al , 2010). Each of these approaches describes a phenotype through qualities that are attributes of an entity .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our experiments, we use the Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) [12], Mammalian Phenotype Ontology (MP) [13], Human Disease Ontology (DO) [15], and Orphanet Rare Disease Ontology (ORDO) [17] provided as part of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2016 competition.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We present our results based on three versions of the PhenomeNET ontology: the first version consists of the plain ontology using only the axioms provided in the Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) [12] and the Mammalian Phenotype Ontology (MP) [13]; in the second version, we extend our original ontology by adding additional lexical and structural mappings generated with the AgreementMakerLight [14] system and represent them as equivalent class axioms in our ontology; and in the third version, we further generate mappings between classes in the PhenomeNET ontology, the Disease Ontology (DO) [15] and the Orphanet Rare Disease Ontology (ORDO) [16]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ontologies are structured vocabularies and the placement of terms within that structure relay information about the relationships of terms to one another and the type of relationship involved. Within MGD, the Gene Ontology (GO Consortium, 2000) and the Mammalian Phenotype Ontology (Smith et al ., 2005) are used extensively for function and phenotype annotations, respectively. In addition, the EMAP/EMAPA (Edinburgh Mouse Atlas Project/Edinburgh Mouse Atlas Project Abstract version) ontology of mouse developmental anatomy (Hayamizu et al ., 2013; Finger et al ., 2015) is used to coordinate anatomical term use among the ontologies.…”
Section: Data Integration and The Role Of Semantic And Data Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%