Ecumenism: Rapprochement Through Co-working to Reconciliation

Hovorun, Cyril

doi:10.3390/rel8050070

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Здесь следует отметить статьи Кристофера Струпа (Stroop, C. (2016) "Bad Ecumenism: The American Culture Wars and Russia's Hard Right Turn", Wheel 6: 21-24), Натальи Василевич (Vasilevich, N. (2013) Orthodox Perspective of the Faith and Order Ecumenical Ecclesiological Convergence Document 'The Church -Towards a Common Vision ' (2012). Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn), а также архимандрита Кирилла Говоруна (Hovorun, C. (2017) "Ecumenism: Rapprochement Through Co-working to Reconciliation", Religions 8(5), 70). Однако публикация этих статей не повлекла за собой какой-либо заметной академической дискуссии.…”

Section: исторические формы экуменизмаunclassified

Discussing the Concept of «Conservative Ecumenism»

Shishkov¹,

Biblical²

2018

SRCH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: исторические формы экуменизмаunclassified

Discussing the Concept of «Conservative Ecumenism»

Shishkov¹,

Biblical²

2018

SRCH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Шишкова участвуют Кристофер Струп 4 , Наталья Василевич 5 , архм. Кирилл (Говорун) [Hovorun, 2017], Кристина Штёкль [Штёкль, 2018: 58-86] и др.…”

unclassified

Models of Ecumenical Dialogue in the Discourse of the Russian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate

Gorodilova

2022

Concept: philosophy, religion, culture

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article is devoted to the models of ecumenical dialogue in the Russian context on the example of the Russian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate. The wide-spread and flourishing discussions about ecumenism in the religious studies and theological fields constitute the problem of this study. The author investigates the problem with the aim to identify existing models of an ecumenical dialogue. Following from this purpose the most significant and discussed concepts of ecumenical dialogue in Russia are noted. The emphasis is placed on the widespread concept of two ecumenisms, most fully disclosed by A. V. Shishkov, and related discussions in the scientific and theological fields. Also, a discussion in the church discourse was revealed, which is based on the concepts of representatives of the Russian Orthodox Church: prot. M. Kozlov, mitr. Hilarion (Alfeyev), fr. Georges Florovsky, archm. Sophronia (Sakharova) and others. To outline the broad picture, there was established the position of the Roman Catholic Church as well as its messages addressed to Orthodoxy. In addition, three main trends in the Russian Orthodox Church in relation to ecumenism are identified and described. The first is anti-ecumenism, its members are against any dialogue with non-Orthodoxy. The second is moderate ecumenism, where participants advocate the idea of acceptable and unacceptable forms of ecumenism without making edits to the Church doctrine, and the third are modernist ecumenists who are ready for changes in the teaching of the Church for the sake of the dialogue. Then, there was a transition to the term ecumenism in the context of modern conceptions about the phenomenon and also in the context of the history of the ecumenical movement of the 20th century. The author makes a conclusion about a fundamental importance of the idea of the unity of Christians for the identification of models of ecumenical dialogue. The unity can be determined as unity in one Church, as well as unity within a common space of communication without crossing borders and making one united church. It is noted that the existing concepts and terminology do not reflect this aspect, thus the author suggests the possibility of using such terms as adaptive and integrative dialogue, and lays out prospects for solving the problem.

show abstract

“…Modern theologians J. Ziziulas [13], С. Ware [14], K. Govorun [15], and V. Rubskyi [16] make a significant contribution to the development of Orthodox theology. They made an attempt to comprehend the basic Christian principles to the demands of today.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Anthropological discourse of orthodoxy in the context of existential uncertainty of modern human being

Sokolovskyi¹,

Shkil²,

Rozbytska³

2020

Вісник Житомирського державного університету імені Івана Франка

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article analyzes the vector of modern transformation of anthropological issues in Orthodoxy, which determines the revision of traditional approaches to the conditions of worship, rites and ceremonies. Among the important conditions of modern religious transformations are considered general civilizational shifts due to the transition to postmodern society, world globalization, the crisis of European civilization, the process of secularization, the pandemic COVID-19. These processes have led to the general "anthropological revolution" that the world community is experiencing today, while actualizing both existential problems and understanding the risks and difficulties of overcoming the pandemic. It has been established that the challenge for the Orthodox Churches is to demonstrate the stability of the faith and to adapt quickly to the realities of today on the basis of ecclesiology.It is proved that the knowledge of the essence of man, in accordance with the existential challenges of today, necessitates theological discourse, rethinking, and the need for a new interpretation of the main issues of ritual practice. Anthropological provisions of Orthodox doctrine, which reveal the nature of man, his purpose in life and ways of salvation, are formed on the basis of Christian dogmas of triadology and Christology, where it is understood as the image and likeness of God. The authors come to understand and interpret the laws of transformation of Christian anthropology, due to the rethinking of the basic dogmatic provisions of the Orthodox faith and sociocultural breakdown of the modern world. Modern theologians draw an important conclusion for the understanding of the individual about the ontological primacy of the incarnation and the person in relation to nature and essence.

show abstract

Ecumenism: Rapprochement Through Co-working to Reconciliation

Cited by 3 publications

References 3 publications

Discussing the Concept of «Conservative Ecumenism»

Discussing the Concept of «Conservative Ecumenism»

Models of Ecumenical Dialogue in the Discourse of the Russian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate

Anthropological discourse of orthodoxy in the context of existential uncertainty of modern human being

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About