2006
DOI: 10.2176/nmc.46.598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ectopic Recurrence of Craniopharyngioma-Case Report-

Abstract: A 27-year-old woman presented with ectopic recurrence manifesting as an asymptomatic mass in the left frontal convexity 5 years after subtotal removal of suprasellar craniopharyngioma through a right orbitozygomatic craniotomy. The mass had enlarged gradually over the next 5 years, so a second operation was performed for total removal. The histological diagnoses of both lesions were adamantinomatous type craniopharyngioma with MIB-1 indexes of 4.2% and 7.4%. The second lesion probably resulted from disseminati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, ectopic craniopharyngioma often presents with invasive characteristics. 2,9 The tumor we describe was a partially intra-axial tumor with invasion of the brainstem and cerebellum. These hypotheses need to be further explored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Accordingly, ectopic craniopharyngioma often presents with invasive characteristics. 2,9 The tumor we describe was a partially intra-axial tumor with invasion of the brainstem and cerebellum. These hypotheses need to be further explored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Our searches yielded 274 studies [275][276][277][279][280][281][282] reporting data for 8058 nonduplicated patients with craniophayngiomas, the majority of whom were presented in aggregated data sets. Disaggregated data useable for survival and progression analysis was presented for 800 patients.…”
Section: Data Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lesion proved to be an adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma like the one that had been previously removed (Kordes et al, 2011). Other case reports have documented similar seeding of tumor cells distant from the original tumor site along the surgical path (Ragoowansi and Piepgras, 1991;Lee et al, 1999;Novegno et al, 2002;Ishii et al, 2004;Kawaguchi et al, 2005;Jeong et al, 2006;Yamada et al, 2006;Bikmaz, 2009;Elliott, 2009;Romani et al, 2010;Blank, 2011;Elfving et al, 2011;Jakobs and Orakcioglu, 2012). It is clear from these reports that craniopharyngioma cells have the ability to remain viable after excision, and that if implanted along the surgical tract can potentially create a second lesion (see Table 31.1).…”
Section: Ectopic Craniopharyngiomasmentioning
confidence: 90%