2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03399.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ectomycorrhizal fungi and interspecific competition: species interactions, community structure, coexistence mechanisms, and future research directions

Abstract: SummaryThe field of ectomycorrhizal fungal (EMF) ecology has largely developed outside the ecological mainstream, owing in large part to the challenges in studying the structure and dynamics of EMF communities. With advances in molecular identification and other research techniques, however, there has been growing interest among mycologists and ecologists in understanding how different ecological factors affect EMF community structure and diversity. While factors such as soil chemistry and host specificity hav… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
130
3
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
(256 reference statements)
5
130
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, evidence from population genetic (38) and phylogeographic (39) studies shows that large geographic features (e.g., oceans, mountains) are effective dispersal barriers to fungal populations. Limited dispersal in tandem with the strong priority effects that have been observed for fungi (40) may give rise to historically contingent fungal communities (41). Such historical contingencies may explain the high levels of community divergence we observed across plots within the same region.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Similarly, evidence from population genetic (38) and phylogeographic (39) studies shows that large geographic features (e.g., oceans, mountains) are effective dispersal barriers to fungal populations. Limited dispersal in tandem with the strong priority effects that have been observed for fungi (40) may give rise to historically contingent fungal communities (41). Such historical contingencies may explain the high levels of community divergence we observed across plots within the same region.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…on the other hand, dark brown and brownish-black ECMs were either formed by certain morphotyperelated fungi or they were later developmental stages of lighter brown ECMs induced by ageing. Progressive methods of identification and quantification of ECMs would have to be used for consistent and reliable analysis of ECM communities on roots of the evaluated cuttings (hönig et al 2000;Kennedy 2010). The application of ECM inoculum to a substrate does not guarantee that ECMs will develop on a host plant (hönig et al 2000;Repáč 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One set of factors that we did not measure, but is known to influence fungal communities, is biotic interactions. Biotic interactions between fungi (Maherali and Klironomos, 2007;Kennedy, 2010;Tucker and Fukami, 2014), predation, or interactions between fungi and other microorganisms (Fitter and Garbaye, 1994) or plants (Davison et al, 2011) could be structuring soil fungal communities. Other abiotic factors that we did not measure, such as soil texture (Lekberg et al, 2007), can also affect fungal community composition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%