1994
DOI: 10.3406/pole.1994.1324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Écrire sa vie. Entretien avec Jorge Semprun

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rassinier is never absent from Semprún's oeuvre. He is present not as an individual, but as a superego for Semprún, who drew his subjects from his own life and believed that the artifice of fiction was essential to convey the truth of life as a Communist and resister in France, Buchenwald, and Spain, and the subsequent traumas he experienced: “j'ai toujours le sentiment que la vérité a parfois besoin d'un peu d'artifice pour être crédible, vraiment vraie” (Alliès, 1994: 24; Semprún, 1991: 357; Semprún, 1996a: 165–167, 217, 262). Semprún presented his decision to write his first account of deportation, Le grand voyage , as a response to listening to the Mauthausen survivor Manuel Azaustre tell his story without artifice:I will always defend the legitimacy of literary fiction in expounding historical truth.…”
Section: The Limits Of Artificementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rassinier is never absent from Semprún's oeuvre. He is present not as an individual, but as a superego for Semprún, who drew his subjects from his own life and believed that the artifice of fiction was essential to convey the truth of life as a Communist and resister in France, Buchenwald, and Spain, and the subsequent traumas he experienced: “j'ai toujours le sentiment que la vérité a parfois besoin d'un peu d'artifice pour être crédible, vraiment vraie” (Alliès, 1994: 24; Semprún, 1991: 357; Semprún, 1996a: 165–167, 217, 262). Semprún presented his decision to write his first account of deportation, Le grand voyage , as a response to listening to the Mauthausen survivor Manuel Azaustre tell his story without artifice:I will always defend the legitimacy of literary fiction in expounding historical truth.…”
Section: The Limits Of Artificementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Semprún's own accounts of the Spanish Communist party leadership and its policies are factual in nature, because he believed that this was a more effective way of countering the denials and mistruths he saw at work in the leadership's recounting of its past and his past: “il n'y a pas un nom qui soit faux, on n'a pas pu me démentir sur un fait. Il y a un effort de véracité historique” (Alliés, 1994: 26). Rather than a traumatic event that those who did not experience it will need literary artifice to grasp, Semprún made the case against the party in historical narratives.…”
Section: The Limits Of Artificementioning
confidence: 99%