2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecotoxicity characterization of chemicals: Global recommendations and implementation in USEtox

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6,12,18,64 For instance, the USEtox model, one of the most used methods to evaluate ecotoxic impacts in LCA, has not addressed the effects of salt releases so far 12 and does not include the coastal seawater and brackish areas as environmental compartments. 19 Therefore, new approaches are necessary to include essential substances and these critical areas in the impact assessment models, and specific methodological choices must be implemented to develop CFs for essential elements in nonfreshwater environments.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…6,12,18,64 For instance, the USEtox model, one of the most used methods to evaluate ecotoxic impacts in LCA, has not addressed the effects of salt releases so far 12 and does not include the coastal seawater and brackish areas as environmental compartments. 19 Therefore, new approaches are necessary to include essential substances and these critical areas in the impact assessment models, and specific methodological choices must be implemented to develop CFs for essential elements in nonfreshwater environments.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the log-logistic and the quadratic curves only converge at intermediate ranges of effects, so this approximation might not be accurate to calculate EFs based on HC10 or HC20, as new trends on ecotoxicity modeling suggest the use of EC10s or EC20s to model the factors. 19 Finally, the sign of each EF will be established depending on the direction of the change: increasing the salt concentration in the low range accounts for a negative EF LOW (impacts decline), and decreasing it accounts for a positive EF LOW (impacts increase), and vice versa for the high range.…”
Section: ■ Effect Factor For Salinity Variations In Aquatic Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations