“…Setting the theoretical premises and postulates of this paper, the following model roots its logic in the foundation of system thinking and the complexity paradigm (Darnhofer et al, 2012b;Meadows, 2009b;Morin, 1992), whose references are growing in the literature on sustainability, management, and evaluation (Darnhofer et al, 2012b;Loorbach et al, 2016;Mitchell et al, 2020). Figure 1 shows the ontological perspective known as the ecological model (Boudreau LeBlanc, 2021a;2021b), rooted in the academic dialogue between technology, economy, and ecology (Gil-Garcia & Sayogo, 2016). The properties of both (program/context) change over time, according to internal and external factors (Latour, 2007).…”
Section: The Theoretical Foundationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), other are ecosocial (market, discourses, values, nature, etc.). A comprehensive literature review (2020–2021) and philosophical study of the scientific and political postulates was conducted throughout the writing process (2018–2022) by recruiting a multidisciplinary team trained in bioethics (Boudreau LeBlanc et al, 2021a) and by coupling the FMV team with the work of a PhD project in bioethics (the corresponding author).Figure 1.The theoretical framework known as the ecological model, rooted in advanced theories in complexity studies, organizes (internal and external) factors that influence the program success, including data, information, and knowledge dissemination. This ontology poses the premises of the following logic model and of the One Health program perspective discussed here.…”
Section: The Theoretical Foundationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empowerment is a program-related response (internal) to organizational factors (external). Factors are contextual ( Boudreau LeBlanc et al, 2021a ); some are political (laws, codes, agreements, etc. ), other are ecosocial (market, discourses, values, nature, etc.).…”
Section: The Theoretical Foundationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), other are ecosocial (market, discourses, values, nature, etc.). A comprehensive literature review (2020–2021) and philosophical study of the scientific and political postulates was conducted throughout the writing process (2018–2022) by recruiting a multidisciplinary team trained in bioethics ( Boudreau LeBlanc et al, 2021a ) and by coupling the FMV team with the work of a PhD project in bioethics (the corresponding author). Figure 1.…”
Successfully designing and implementing a program is complex; it requires a reflexive balance between the available resources and the priorities of various stakeholders, both of which change over time. Logic models are theory-based evaluation approaches used to identify and address key challenges of a program. This article describes the process of building a logic model on advanced theories in complexity studies. The models aim to support a province-wide multispecies monitoring system of antimicrobial use (AMU), designed in collaboration with the animal health sector in Quebec (Canada). Based on a rigorous theoretical foundation, the logic model is built in three steps: (1) mapping, a narrative review of literature on similar programs in other jurisdictions; (2) framing, iterative consultations with project members to elaborate the logic model; (3) shaping, hypotheses based on the logic model. The model emerges from the reflexive balancing of current scientific knowledge and empirical insights to gather relevant information about stakeholders from interdisciplinary experts that led a 3-year consensus-building process within the community. Recognizing the challenge of unpacking theories for practical use, we illustrate how the process of an “open” logic model building could enable governance coordination in complex processes. Logic models are useful for evaluating public, private, and academic partnerships in One Health programs that characterize an adaptive governance process.
“…Setting the theoretical premises and postulates of this paper, the following model roots its logic in the foundation of system thinking and the complexity paradigm (Darnhofer et al, 2012b;Meadows, 2009b;Morin, 1992), whose references are growing in the literature on sustainability, management, and evaluation (Darnhofer et al, 2012b;Loorbach et al, 2016;Mitchell et al, 2020). Figure 1 shows the ontological perspective known as the ecological model (Boudreau LeBlanc, 2021a;2021b), rooted in the academic dialogue between technology, economy, and ecology (Gil-Garcia & Sayogo, 2016). The properties of both (program/context) change over time, according to internal and external factors (Latour, 2007).…”
Section: The Theoretical Foundationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), other are ecosocial (market, discourses, values, nature, etc.). A comprehensive literature review (2020–2021) and philosophical study of the scientific and political postulates was conducted throughout the writing process (2018–2022) by recruiting a multidisciplinary team trained in bioethics (Boudreau LeBlanc et al, 2021a) and by coupling the FMV team with the work of a PhD project in bioethics (the corresponding author).Figure 1.The theoretical framework known as the ecological model, rooted in advanced theories in complexity studies, organizes (internal and external) factors that influence the program success, including data, information, and knowledge dissemination. This ontology poses the premises of the following logic model and of the One Health program perspective discussed here.…”
Section: The Theoretical Foundationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empowerment is a program-related response (internal) to organizational factors (external). Factors are contextual ( Boudreau LeBlanc et al, 2021a ); some are political (laws, codes, agreements, etc. ), other are ecosocial (market, discourses, values, nature, etc.).…”
Section: The Theoretical Foundationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), other are ecosocial (market, discourses, values, nature, etc.). A comprehensive literature review (2020–2021) and philosophical study of the scientific and political postulates was conducted throughout the writing process (2018–2022) by recruiting a multidisciplinary team trained in bioethics ( Boudreau LeBlanc et al, 2021a ) and by coupling the FMV team with the work of a PhD project in bioethics (the corresponding author). Figure 1.…”
Successfully designing and implementing a program is complex; it requires a reflexive balance between the available resources and the priorities of various stakeholders, both of which change over time. Logic models are theory-based evaluation approaches used to identify and address key challenges of a program. This article describes the process of building a logic model on advanced theories in complexity studies. The models aim to support a province-wide multispecies monitoring system of antimicrobial use (AMU), designed in collaboration with the animal health sector in Quebec (Canada). Based on a rigorous theoretical foundation, the logic model is built in three steps: (1) mapping, a narrative review of literature on similar programs in other jurisdictions; (2) framing, iterative consultations with project members to elaborate the logic model; (3) shaping, hypotheses based on the logic model. The model emerges from the reflexive balancing of current scientific knowledge and empirical insights to gather relevant information about stakeholders from interdisciplinary experts that led a 3-year consensus-building process within the community. Recognizing the challenge of unpacking theories for practical use, we illustrate how the process of an “open” logic model building could enable governance coordination in complex processes. Logic models are useful for evaluating public, private, and academic partnerships in One Health programs that characterize an adaptive governance process.
La bioéthique potterienne joue un rôle proactif, lorsque mise en oeuvre en collaboration avec des équipes multidisciplinaires ayant le mandat d'opérationnaliser une politique publique, comme souligné dans la Revue canadienne de bioéthique en 2022, qui a publié en 2022 plusieurs articles sur la pensée de Van Rensselaer Potter, afin de souligner le 50 e anniversaire de la première publication du terme bioéthique dans la littérature nord-américaine. Encore trop peu détaillée, cette perspective globale offre une réflexion critique sur la place, le rôle et l'impératif de la bioéthique à titre d'aménagement adaptatif de l'environnement ; et vise à accompagner les projets empiriques lors de l'opération de leurs visions scientifiques, politiques et publiques, parfois synergiques, d'autre fois conflictuelles. Pour préciser l'opérationnalisation de cette perspective globale de la bioéthique, il apparait intéressant de mobiliser les notions théoriques issues de la sociologie et de la philosophie des sciences, notamment le concept latourien de Forum hybride et celui de Paradigme associé à Thomas Kuhn. Pour illustrer ceci, l'argument mobilise le cas empirique d'un projet de conception d'un monitorage de l'utilisation des antibiotiques au Québec, Canada (2018, et ouvre sur l'importance de prendre conscience du contexte (technologique, sociologique et anthropologique) afin d'approfondir et de poser des critiques constructives. Cet article dépeint une perspective alternative à l'acte de gouverner en proposant un processus proactif de gouvernance.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
