Ecosystem Services Provisioning, Urban Growth and the Rural–Urban Interface: A Case Study from China

Abstract

The rural-urban (peri-urban) interface zones are important places that generate demands for ecosystem goods and services (EG & S). Urban regions face transitions in land use that affect ecosystem services (EG & S) and thus human wellbeing. Especially in urban areas with high population densities (as in most of China) and high demand for EG & S, the future availability of such services must be considered in order to promote effective and sustainable decision making and prevent further ecosystem degradation. The challenge for local government planners and land managers is to find tools that allow relevant data to be collected and analyzed. Ideally, such tools should be able to give a rapid assessment, and not involve large teams of highly trained personnel or incur high costs. The paper reports on the development and trial of such a tool. The paper has three main parts. First, we present a brief overview of the current and developing situation in China, in relation to urbanization, population shifts and the creation of peri-urban areas (PUAs). Next, we build on insights from the literature and from discussions with village heads and county- and prefecture-level officials to develop an understanding of their needs for tools to help planning and land management within the constraints of the national policy. Lastly, a “template” was derived from our multi-method approach that provided a new technical tool for the rapid assessment of the value of EG & S in each of five land use categories. The tool embodies a way to address trade-offs between environmental, social and economic values in the transition zone between rural and urban areas. The tool was trialed in QinBei District in Guangxi Autonomous Region in south China and judged to be useful and adaptable to other rural–urban regions.

From Uncertainties to Solutions: A Scenario-Based Framework for an Agriculture Protection Zone in Magic Valley Idaho

“…Sprawl and various development types can play a significant role in various issues that may occur due to increased development and systematic shifts in growth or conservation trends. These fringe areas are typically used as a reserve for future development [27]; however, with informed planning and efficiency, various fringe areas (otherwise known as the rural-urban interface (RUI)) can be viewed as a solution space to many issues in our built environment [26,27]. Due to these impacts, landscapes, viewed as SESs that incorporate social and built environments, have the potential to support adaptive responses to environmental and development sus-tainability challenges.…”

Investment in Land Restoration: New Perspectives with Special Reference to Australia

“…A significant class of farmland suffering from this degradation lies in the growing areas of peri-urban land. Feng et al, [4] (this volume), have discussed the impact from the ongoing migration from rural areas to cities and near city farmland using a prefecture in South West China as an example. The resulting flow of polluted storm or other drainage waters from urban to peri-urban and rural areas often contains pollutants such as salts, heavy metals, biologically active chemicals, and nutrients, having attendant health and eutrophication impacts on the rural land it may be draining to.…”

“…In these examples, PES is seen in a broader sense, contributing to the livelihood of land managers and to other off site, regional or international beneficiaries, but replication is still limited, the transaction costs are significant. NRM in this broad sense is also not sustainable once the institution withdraws support for the transaction costs [4]. These substantial but still piece meal investments will not solve the issue of sustainability.…”

“…There are substantial international agencies with the capacity to perform this service in most countries and possessing detailed methodologies that might be utilized in this way (see below in Section 5). Feng et al [4] have developed an index of ecosystem services to enable investments to be ranked according to global, national, catchment or local level. This facilitates the "brokering" and monitoring of services [61] by land managers to markets interested in specific ecosystem outcomes at these different scales.…”

A systematic review of studies on fine and coarse root traits measurement: towards the enhancement of urban forests monitoring and management

“…However, specific demands drive plant management by altering forests and tree attributes (Felipe-Lucia et al, 2018), which may affect their self-organization, adaptative capacity, and resilience (Nocentini et al, 2022). Short-and long-term innovation and optimization strategies are required for the sustainable provision of these ecosystem services (Mann et al, 2022), which, to be effective, should be based not only on increasing the tree cover (Przewoźna et al, 2022), but on an integrated perspective that includes the economic, environmental, and social dynamics of the rural-to-urban gradient (Feng et al, 2021). In this scenario, restoring, increasing, and preserving forest biodiversity, including a minimum of 10% of urban areas covered by tree canopy in all cities by 2050 (European Commission, Directorate-General for Environment, 2021,2023), as well as integrating with their sustainable strategic planning also green space networks characterizing the periurban areas (Verdú-Vázquez et al, 2021), represent a crucial multiple task.…”