2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41893-021-00689-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecosystem services benefits from the restoration of non-producing US oil and gas lands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This recommendation would be a way to limit further ecosystem services loss for the region (Jordaan et al, 2021) and maintain an ecologically well-functioning landscape. Furthermore, restoration of lands on defunct infrastructure (e.g., inactive oil and gas wells) in select regions could be an effective mitigation strategy to further strengthen connectivity on high quality regions while energy development continues or expands in currently heavily impacted areas (McClung and Moran, 2018;Haden Chomphosy et al, 2021;Jordaan et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This recommendation would be a way to limit further ecosystem services loss for the region (Jordaan et al, 2021) and maintain an ecologically well-functioning landscape. Furthermore, restoration of lands on defunct infrastructure (e.g., inactive oil and gas wells) in select regions could be an effective mitigation strategy to further strengthen connectivity on high quality regions while energy development continues or expands in currently heavily impacted areas (McClung and Moran, 2018;Haden Chomphosy et al, 2021;Jordaan et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If, on the other hand, surface reclamation is a priority for environmental, aesthetic, job creation, or other reasons, our results will help policymakers quantify the costs associated with achieving those additional benefits (and perhaps adjust bonding requirements accordingly). One recent analyses suggests that restoring the surface can have large ecosystem service benefits, 26 though these benefits will vary considerably by region and land use type.…”
Section: Discussion and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another recent analysis 26 estimates substantial ecosystem service benefits from decommissioning wells, including agricultural use, CO2 sequestration, and other services. The authors estimate that the present value of ecosystem service benefits from restoring the surface at 430,000 well sites would be $21 billion, or $49,000 per well.…”
Section: Risks Of Unplugged Abandoned Wellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another recent analysis 27 estimates substantial ecosystem services benefits from decommissioning wells, including restored agricultural use, CO 2 sequestration, and other services (Again, the analysis excludes methane emissions mitigation.). The authors estimate that the present value of ecosystem services benefits from restoring the surface at 430,000 well sites in the United States would be roughly $21 billion or $49,000 per well.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%