2017
DOI: 10.1002/eap.1639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecosystem regime shifts disrupt trophic structure

Abstract: Regime shifts between alternative stable ecosystem states are becoming commonplace due to the combined effects of local stressors and global climate change. Alternative states are characterised as substantially different in form and function to pre-disturbance states, disrupting the delivery of ecosystem services and functions. On coral reefs, regime shifts are typically characterised by a change Accepted ArticleThis article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.in the benthic composition from coral-t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(148 reference statements)
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regime‐shifted fish communities were most distinct from their coral‐dominated baselines. These patterns build on previous observations from Seychelles demonstrating that macroalgal overgrowth has resulted in bottom‐heavy fish biomass pyramids and reduced functional diversity (Graham et al, ; Hempson, Graham, MacNeil, Hoey, & Wilson, ). Declines in coral cover and flattening of habitat structure likely prevented coral‐associated species from relocating or recruiting to macroalgal reefs, despite these fish being present on nearby recovering reefs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Regime‐shifted fish communities were most distinct from their coral‐dominated baselines. These patterns build on previous observations from Seychelles demonstrating that macroalgal overgrowth has resulted in bottom‐heavy fish biomass pyramids and reduced functional diversity (Graham et al, ; Hempson, Graham, MacNeil, Hoey, & Wilson, ). Declines in coral cover and flattening of habitat structure likely prevented coral‐associated species from relocating or recruiting to macroalgal reefs, despite these fish being present on nearby recovering reefs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In this case, the rapid downslope increase in water depth can likely be implicated as nearvertical morphology is challenging to image because of light attenuation and shadowing (Jay et al 2017). Ways to more routinely separate live coral from macroalgae in multispectral imagery are of heightening importance given the large-scale regime shift of reefs to algal-dominated states (Graham et al 2015;Hughes et al 2017;Hempson et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effects of habitat degradation can also migrate up the food web, altering the composition and size structure of prey fish assemblages Hempson, Graham, MacNeil, Hoey, & Wilson 2017), and indirectly impacting piscivorous reef-associated predators .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%