2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10021-007-9115-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecosystem Recovery Across a Chronosequence of Restored Wetlands in the Platte River Valley

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
46
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
3
46
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The slope of the linear relationship could be considered the sequestration rate. Our results (Table 3) were numerically smaller than previously published data on WRP in North America (Euliss et al, 2006) and on restored wetlands but non‐WRP lands in the Platte River valley of central Nebraska (Meyer et al, 2008). This is likely because our study area was located in southern North America, where soil temperatures are much higher.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…The slope of the linear relationship could be considered the sequestration rate. Our results (Table 3) were numerically smaller than previously published data on WRP in North America (Euliss et al, 2006) and on restored wetlands but non‐WRP lands in the Platte River valley of central Nebraska (Meyer et al, 2008). This is likely because our study area was located in southern North America, where soil temperatures are much higher.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…Such disturbances can undermine a wetland's ability to capture carbon, but critically, result in microbial breakdown, demineralization and ultimately release of significant amounts of carbon that had already been stored (Atwood et al., ; Lal et al, ; Page & Dalal, ; Pendleton et al., ). Conversion to agricultural land for cropping and grazing can lead to 80%–96% reduction in wetland soil organic carbon (Meyer, Baer, & Whiles, ; Sigua, Coleman, & Albano, ). By providing estimates on wetland carbon stocks, and wetland loss, we can use this information to estimate the carbon losses from wetland degradation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each plot, three 10×10 m soil sampling quadrates were randomly chosen. Within a sampling quadrate, five 0 to 10 cm depth soil cores were extracted using a 3.6-cm diameter auger and were composite into one sample as the surface soils experienced the most changes during the reforestation process (Meyer et al 2008). The soil core was extracted at a distance of 50 cm from trunk of the dominant tree in the quadrate as microbial community might vary with distance to trunk (Saetre and Bååth 2008).…”
Section: Site Distribution and Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%