1998
DOI: 10.2307/1467960
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecosystem Metabolism, Disturbance, and Stability in a Prealpine Gravel Bed River

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
141
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
11
141
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The percentage canals/ditches in CCYK also was correlated to discharge (rho = 0.86) and point velocity measurements (rho = 0.70), indicating an increase in flow with increased ditching and channel modification, likely because of irrigation return flows. Previous work has suggested that streams with velocity perturbations and unstable sediment were dominated by respiration (Young and Huryn 1996;Uehlinger and Naegeli 1998;Biggs et al 1999), which is consistent with CCYK results. The models indicated that the wetted cross-sectional area in streams in CNBR explained most of the variability in CR-24 values in that area, with increased CR-24 values in streams with a larger cross-sectional wetted area.…”
Section: Channel or Habitat Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The percentage canals/ditches in CCYK also was correlated to discharge (rho = 0.86) and point velocity measurements (rho = 0.70), indicating an increase in flow with increased ditching and channel modification, likely because of irrigation return flows. Previous work has suggested that streams with velocity perturbations and unstable sediment were dominated by respiration (Young and Huryn 1996;Uehlinger and Naegeli 1998;Biggs et al 1999), which is consistent with CCYK results. The models indicated that the wetted cross-sectional area in streams in CNBR explained most of the variability in CR-24 values in that area, with increased CR-24 values in streams with a larger cross-sectional wetted area.…”
Section: Channel or Habitat Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Odum (1956) considered the potential effects of groundwater flux on the mass balance of oxygen in streams, and more recent work (Choi et al 1998;Jones and Mulholland 1998) has demonstrated empirically that flux of groundwater can greatly affect gas concentrations in streams, but the effects of flux on estimates of stream metabolism have not been examined explicitly. Although practitioners of the open-channel method (e.g., Marzolf et al 1994;Uehlinger and Naegeli 1998;Fellows et al 2001) often have attempted to confine their work to reaches where rates of groundwater flux are low, the potential for error in open-channel estimates of metabolism has not been studied. The purpose of this paper is to establish the conditions under which flux of groundwater can lead to bias in estimates of metabolism and to describe a method for minimizing such errors.…”
Section: Effects Of Groundwater Flux On Open-channel Estimates Of Strmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These consequences of reduced snowpack include spring snowmelt occurring earlier coupled with a reduction in the amount of snowmelt-derived runoff into stream networks (Adam and others 2009). Although snow-and ice-dominated aquatic ecosystems in high latitudes are relevant for global carbon fluxes due to extensive C storage and mobilization (Lapierre and others 2013), little is known about the relevance of alpine streams for carbon fluxes (except see Uehlinger and Naegeli 1998;Uehlinger 2006). Understanding the response of stream metabolism to altered snowmelt hydrology is therefore critical to better predict impacts of global warming on carbon fluxes in alpine ecosystems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%