2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2019.106762
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecosystem carbon in relation to woody plant encroachment and control: Juniper systems in Oregon, USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a study at paired watershed in central Oregon where western juniper trees were cut in one watershed considered as treated, and were left intact in another as untreated (Abdallah et al,2020). Thirteen years after control, soil carbon stocks at both 0−25 cm and 25−50 cm depth were not affected by juniper control.…”
Section: No Change In Carbon Sequestrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a study at paired watershed in central Oregon where western juniper trees were cut in one watershed considered as treated, and were left intact in another as untreated (Abdallah et al,2020). Thirteen years after control, soil carbon stocks at both 0−25 cm and 25−50 cm depth were not affected by juniper control.…”
Section: No Change In Carbon Sequestrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Encroachment is an ecological phenomenon in which density, cover and biomass of native woody or shrubby plants is increased in various grasslands, predominantly arid and semiarid grasslands (Van Auken, 2000) and is global in occurrence (Abdallah et al,2020). Woody plant encroachment has been described over the past 150 years in several ecosystems of the world (Archer et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess land cover effects on SOC down to 1 m depth, species richness and herbaceous biomass, we applied general linear models with land cover type as fixed effect, followed by Tukey`s HSD Post-hoc test. Estimates of SOC stocks per unit area (t C ha -1 ) were computed using the formula: SOC t ha -1 = %SOC x BD (g cm -3 ) x d (cm), where %SOC = carbon concentration of the sample, BD = bulk density in g cm -3 , and d = height of the depth increment (cm) 98,104 . Total carbon stocks down to 1 m depth were then obtained by summing up the…”
Section: Field Sampling and Laboratory Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Juniper woodlands provide ecosystem services such as biodiversity, aesthetic beauty, wildlife habitat [15][16][17], and products such as firewood, fencing posts, and commercial energy production [12]. Juniper plays an important role in carbon sequestration in aboveground biomass [18]. Western juniper dominance in sagebrush steppe has several negative consequences, including reductions in herbaceous production and diversity [19,20], deterioration of wildlife habitat [21], and higher erosion and runoff potential [12,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies attempting to quantify these effects have described the potential negative effects of juniper expansion [24][25][26][27][28][29][30] with others finding negligible effects of juniper on water yield [31][32][33]. Western juniper cutting has resulted in no net change in ecosystem carbon pools when comparing cut versus uncut areas [18]. Several studies indicate western juniper control could have positive results on hydrologic processes such as increased soil moisture and reduced evapotranspiration losses [29,30,34,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%