2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecosystem approach to water resources management using the MIKE 11 modeling system in the Strymonas River and Lake Kerkini

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, a sizeable number of models, such as MIKE developed by DHI [17], the QUAL series model developed by US EPA [18], and EFDC developed by VIMS [19], have been widely used for water environment simulation. Among them, MIKE has shown favorable functionality and strong applicability in a number of river network studies.…”
Section: -D Mathematical River Network Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, a sizeable number of models, such as MIKE developed by DHI [17], the QUAL series model developed by US EPA [18], and EFDC developed by VIMS [19], have been widely used for water environment simulation. Among them, MIKE has shown favorable functionality and strong applicability in a number of river network studies.…”
Section: -D Mathematical River Network Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between the river discharge and water level (stage) or rating curves are thus important to design hydraulic structures of a flood management project and in the making of reservoir releasing policy (Rahman et al 2011). An analysis of river water level at various cross sections using a physically based flood routing hydrodynamic model is quite weighty because it requires large numbers of data sets such as time series discharge, river morphometric parameters, river hydraulics variables, bed resistance, and roughness coefficients (Vansteenkiste et al 2013;Doulgeris et al 2012). Several research studies demonstrated a successful utilization of hydrodynamic models in flood routing and stage-discharge computations using measured cross sections and time series data sets (Doulgeris et al 2012;Rahman et al 2011;Thompson et al 2009;Patro et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An analysis of river water level at various cross sections using a physically based flood routing hydrodynamic model is quite weighty because it requires large numbers of data sets such as time series discharge, river morphometric parameters, river hydraulics variables, bed resistance, and roughness coefficients (Vansteenkiste et al 2013;Doulgeris et al 2012). Several research studies demonstrated a successful utilization of hydrodynamic models in flood routing and stage-discharge computations using measured cross sections and time series data sets (Doulgeris et al 2012;Rahman et al 2011;Thompson et al 2009;Patro et al 2009). These models require precise river geometric data, which is difficult to measure at the desired study area locations because a few studies also reported several instability issues in the river flow hydrodynamic models (Rahman et al 2011;Thomson et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It proactively defends and protects the ecological health of the ecosystem. It is becoming the preferred approach for managing water quality, for example, in Europe [7], Australia [8] and South Africa [9]. For example, the European Union Water Framework Directive (WFD, 2000/60/EC) explicitly recognises and consciously advocates the ecosystem approach to managing the surface water quality of water bodies within the EU member states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%