2016
DOI: 10.1134/s1067413616010069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecophysiological indicators of microbial biomass status in chernozem soils of the Central Caucasus (in the territory of Kabardino-Balkaria with the Terek variant of altitudinal zonation)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An increase or decrease in this indicator shows a change in the nutrients availability, since the microbial biomass reacts very sensitively to any factors of disturbance, while the total soil carbon content, on the contrary, is a stable indicator. The Cmic/Corg values presented (Table 3) are close to the data previously established for chernozems in the plain part of Kabardino-Balkaria (2.8-4.7%) (Gorobtsova et al, 2016). The differences found at the level of the type of the studied soils are not statistically significant (t = 0.065; P = 0.95), and the characteristic Cmic/Corg indicator can be taken to be close to 3-4%.…”
Section: Physical and Physicochemical Soil Propertiessupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An increase or decrease in this indicator shows a change in the nutrients availability, since the microbial biomass reacts very sensitively to any factors of disturbance, while the total soil carbon content, on the contrary, is a stable indicator. The Cmic/Corg values presented (Table 3) are close to the data previously established for chernozems in the plain part of Kabardino-Balkaria (2.8-4.7%) (Gorobtsova et al, 2016). The differences found at the level of the type of the studied soils are not statistically significant (t = 0.065; P = 0.95), and the characteristic Cmic/Corg indicator can be taken to be close to 3-4%.…”
Section: Physical and Physicochemical Soil Propertiessupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The established differences in absolute values between soil types are statistically significant for all enzymes (t ≥ 2.72; p ≥ 0.00), except for urease (t = 1.41; p = 0.16). According to the literature data (Sinsabaugh et al, 2010;Oliveira Silva et al, 2018;Kazeev et al, 2021) and the results of previous studies of the lowland chernozems of Kabardino-Balkaria (Gedgafova et al, 2015;Gorobtsova et al, 2016) the activity of hydrolytic enzymes is closely related to the organic matter content.…”
Section: Biochemical Soil Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this regard, ASP with higher soil pH and nitrogen content has the highest metabolic rate. To better understand the state of microbial communities, we also calculated CAI (Gorobtsova et al 2016). This parameter which is the ratio between BR and SIR is significantly lower in DNF compared to other forest stands.…”
Section: Soil Biological Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S BR and S SIR are considered as an index of soil quality and are controlled by S OM , soil nutrients, quality of the substrate, and humic substances(Singh et al 2012;Mganga et al 2016;Gorobtsova et al 2016). The S BR provide an estimate of heterotrophic activity of the soil microbial community and availability of soil carbon to soil microorganisms(Cheng et al 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%