2023
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2023.1112177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecophysiological basis of spatiotemporal patterns in picophytoplankton pigments in the global ocean

Abstract: Information on the intracellular content and functional diversity of phytoplankton pigments can provide valuable insight on the ecophysiological state of primary producers and the flow of energy within aquatic ecosystems. Combined global datasets of analytical flow cytometry (AFC) cell counts and High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) pigment concentrations were used to examine vertical and seasonal variability in the ratios of phytoplankton pigments in relation to indices of cellular photoacclimation. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
(137 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Veldhuis and Kraay (2004) give a range of 93 -122 for Prochlorococcus, and 38 -58 for Synechococcus which is within range of the values reported here. The range of 9 -499 for Prochlorococcus reported by Phongphattarawat et al (2023), based on a pigment-based analysis of a global dataset that included AMT data, is close to the range reported here. Figure 8 shows an intercomparison of Prochlorococcus C versus Chl between this work and previous literature values.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Veldhuis and Kraay (2004) give a range of 93 -122 for Prochlorococcus, and 38 -58 for Synechococcus which is within range of the values reported here. The range of 9 -499 for Prochlorococcus reported by Phongphattarawat et al (2023), based on a pigment-based analysis of a global dataset that included AMT data, is close to the range reported here. Figure 8 shows an intercomparison of Prochlorococcus C versus Chl between this work and previous literature values.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…When data points are selected based on the dominant type present in the sample [i.e., >50% of the chlorophyll concentration can be attributable to Prochlorococcus (Figure 2)] regression statistics of slope: 0.672 ± 0.039, intercept: 1.392 ± 0.045, R 2 : 0.219 are obtained. This compares with slope: 0.843, intercept: 1.711, R 2 : 0.41 for Phongphattarawat et al (2023) using 49 fg C cell -1 (Cailliau et al, 1996) and slope: 0.788, intercept: 1.798, R 2 : 0.47 for Phongphattarawat et al ( 2023) using 52 and 158 fg C cell -1 for euphotic and sub-euphotic populations, respectively (Casey et al, 2013). Our values tend towards C:Chl = 145 (Sathyendranath et al, 2009) at low values (~0.01 mg m -3 ) of Chl, and diverge away (below) this at higher (~1 mg m -3 ) Chl.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation