2012
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph9124704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecophysiological and Climatological Effects on Distribution of Vector Species and Malaria Incidence in India

Abstract: The magnitude of regional malaria risk is dependent primarily on the dynamics and distribution of the vector species, which are determined mainly by climate conditions. A coupled model with ecophysiological and climatological factors was developed to estimate the spatiotemporal distribution of the five species of dominant malaria vectors in monsoon Asia. Here, we examined how the potential distribution obtained from the model could explain trends in malaria incidence observed in India, which has the highest nu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…et al, 2015), and therefore, malaria is considered as a local and focal disease (Conn et al, 2015; Dash et al, 2008; Rath, 2004). Several studies involving different ecological and climatic settings have provided evidence that malaria epidemiology can be significantly variable across small eco-climatic scales (Jambulingam et al, 1991; Kaga and Ohta, 2012; Schapira and Boutsika, 2012). For example, malaria epidemiological outcomes including distributional prevalence of mosquito vectors and malaria transmission were correlated with different ecotypes in Nigeria (Okwa et al, 2009), Kenya (Ingasia et al, 2015), Brazil (Rosa-Freitas et al, 2007), Southeast Asia (Seng et al, 1999) and India (Jambulingam et al, 1991; Ramar et al, 2014; Shukla et al, 2007; Singh et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…et al, 2015), and therefore, malaria is considered as a local and focal disease (Conn et al, 2015; Dash et al, 2008; Rath, 2004). Several studies involving different ecological and climatic settings have provided evidence that malaria epidemiology can be significantly variable across small eco-climatic scales (Jambulingam et al, 1991; Kaga and Ohta, 2012; Schapira and Boutsika, 2012). For example, malaria epidemiological outcomes including distributional prevalence of mosquito vectors and malaria transmission were correlated with different ecotypes in Nigeria (Okwa et al, 2009), Kenya (Ingasia et al, 2015), Brazil (Rosa-Freitas et al, 2007), Southeast Asia (Seng et al, 1999) and India (Jambulingam et al, 1991; Ramar et al, 2014; Shukla et al, 2007; Singh et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Search verification was conducted by manually searching the reference lists of ten randomly selected relevant papers for titles, which may be relevant to this scoping study [10,14,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the major geographic distribution of malaria is assumed around the equator, it keeps being a latent global threat. Given the relation between malaria transmission and climate [ 2 ], the increase in global temperature is possibly causing tropical diseases and vectors to spread to higher altitudes in mountainous regions, and to higher latitudes that were previously spared. Furthermore, recent outbreaks of malaria in countries that had been malaria-free indicate the continuous threat of re-establishment of the disease in areas that were considered malaria-free [ 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%