2005
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-28518-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economists’ Mathematical Manual

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence these first-order conditions give a global maximum of the Hamiltonian in the control variables, and c χ . The Hamiltonian is jointly concave 5 in the two control variables and the state variable, wealth, and hence satisfies the Mangasarian condition for our set of equations to give a maximum for the dynamic programming problem (see Sydsaeter, Strøm and Berck 2000).…”
Section: T W T W H T Z V H T Z T U C T W T W H T Z V H T Z T U C T W mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Hence these first-order conditions give a global maximum of the Hamiltonian in the control variables, and c χ . The Hamiltonian is jointly concave 5 in the two control variables and the state variable, wealth, and hence satisfies the Mangasarian condition for our set of equations to give a maximum for the dynamic programming problem (see Sydsaeter, Strøm and Berck 2000).…”
Section: T W T W H T Z V H T Z T U C T W T W H T Z V H T Z T U C T W mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…while According to Taylor's theorem (see for example Sydsaeter et al (1991)), for any function f that is twice continuously differentiable, there exists µ ∈ (0, 1) such that…”
Section: Production With Optimal Replicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…those with more than one household member, does not define individual WTP. The estimated price change should therefore be: (i) recalculated into an annuity and, assuming eternal life of the property, the estimated value is multiplied by the real discount factor, r, [68] and (ii) divided by the number of household members that the WTP refers to, n. Moreover, Eq. 2 ignores the effect of a property tax.…”
Section: Noise Evaluation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%