1988
DOI: 10.2307/1926784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economies of Size and Scope in Rural Low-Volume Roads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These weights are commonly used in studies on production of urban utilities, e.g. Coelli and Walding (2005) for water supply, Rubiera (2007) in studies testing central place, hierarchy, and location theories, Deller et al (1988) for rural low-volume roads, all of which obtain provision prices by means of engineering costs analyses. 11.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These weights are commonly used in studies on production of urban utilities, e.g. Coelli and Walding (2005) for water supply, Rubiera (2007) in studies testing central place, hierarchy, and location theories, Deller et al (1988) for rural low-volume roads, all of which obtain provision prices by means of engineering costs analyses. 11.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the challenges of service delivery and expectations of service recipients diff er from community to community, the eff ects of scale economies are less clear than many who reject comparison across population ranges assume. Studies of economies of scale for local government services report diff erent economy-of-scale rates and ceilings across various municipal functions and are sometimes contradictory in their fi ndings ( Ahlbrandt 1973;Boyne 1995;DeBoer 1992 ;Deller, Chicoine, and Walzer 1988 ;Duncombe and Yinger 1993;Fox 1980;Gyimah-Brempong 1987;Hirsch 1964Hirsch , 1965Hirsch , 1968Kitchen 1976;Newton 1982;Ostrom, Bish, and Ostrom 1988;Savas 1977aSavas , 1977bTravers, Jones, and Burnham 1993;Walzer 1972 ). Nevertheless, most participants in the North Carolina project prefer comparisons with cities of similar size despite ambiguous evidence of populationrelated eff ects on service quality or unit costs within the project data.…”
Section: Comparison With Othersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, only a couple of studies have investigated the scale and technical efficiency of local road maintenance for several US states. DELLER et al (1988) and CHICOINE et al (1989) examined the size efficiency in the production of rural roads by means of cost functions. Both studies identified substantial size inefficiencies and the authors concluded that cost reductions could be realized by restructuring the production of rural roads.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%