2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2004.08.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economies of scale, technological progress, and the sources of economic growth: case of Korea, 1969–2000

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where : (11) Note that the numerator of Tr (M ) trace is always negative, so the trace will be negative when the denominator is positive, which is equivalent to the condition > ((1 + )(1 e ) n ) (1 + ) k n + (1 + )( k + e ) ;…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where : (11) Note that the numerator of Tr (M ) trace is always negative, so the trace will be negative when the denominator is positive, which is equivalent to the condition > ((1 + )(1 e ) n ) (1 + ) k n + (1 + )( k + e ) ;…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hansen and Knowles (1998) found that the average estimated returns to scale were around 1.105 for highincome OECD countries (including Australia, Belgium, Canada, Finland, France, West Germany, Japan, Norway, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States). Miyagawa et al (2006) found that estimated returns to scale in Japan were about 1.075, and Kwack and Sun (2005) found them to be around 1.1 for South Korea. With these numbers in mind, it is clear that dependence on imported energy can significantly increase a country's risk of indeterminacy, thereby making the country more susceptible to sunspots-driven fluctuations.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Section 2 discusses the theoretic foundation of the decomposition of economic 2 The empirical study of this decomposition of the TFP growth has earlier been applied to Korea with the production function approach by Kim and Han (2001) and with the cost function approach by Kwack and Sun (2005), and to the U.S. with the production function approach by Sharma et al (2007). and productivity growth, Section 3 elaborates on the data used for empirical estimation of the growth experience in post-reform China and introduces the empirical model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our finding that the production structures of the sampled sectors are characterized by increasing RTS is in line with those of some previous studies. For example, Kwack and Sun (2005) and Park and Kwon (1995) found similar results with regard to the existence of scale economies and increasing RTS in Korea. On the contrary, Kim and Han (2001) and Oh et al (2008), although based on different datasets and periods, found constant and even decreasing RTS in Korean manufacturing industries.…”
Section: Rtsmentioning
confidence: 66%