2019
DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economics of tobacco control (part 3): evidence from the ITC Project

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings of this study show similar findings from other previous studies about knowledge variables such as the health penalities of active and passive smoking (Al Mamun et al, 2018), smoking in public places (Sinha et al, 2008), the law of banning the sale of tobacco to minors (Abuelfoutoh et al, 2014), the banning of advertisements (Abuelfoutoh et al, 2014), an increase in taxes (Forster et al, 2007;Van Walbeek, 2005) and the lessons of negative effects of smoking (Bala et al, 2017;McVey & Stapleton, 2000). In short, measures concerning smoking reduction are well-known to smokers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The findings of this study show similar findings from other previous studies about knowledge variables such as the health penalities of active and passive smoking (Al Mamun et al, 2018), smoking in public places (Sinha et al, 2008), the law of banning the sale of tobacco to minors (Abuelfoutoh et al, 2014), the banning of advertisements (Abuelfoutoh et al, 2014), an increase in taxes (Forster et al, 2007;Van Walbeek, 2005) and the lessons of negative effects of smoking (Bala et al, 2017;McVey & Stapleton, 2000). In short, measures concerning smoking reduction are well-known to smokers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Were Albania to increase the excise rate to 75%, as per WHO FCTC minimum rate recommendation, the projected smoking reduction is 24.5% within 15 years [11]. Empirical work for many countries has consistently shown that taxation is the most effective instrument in reducing smoking [25,26]. Our finding that poor males are more likely to smoke than rich males also supports the notion that a much higher excise tax rate than the current 49% could be very effective in deterring smoking, particularly among poor males.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pendekatan ini tidak hanya selaras dengan Sustainable Develop-ment Goals (SDGs) yang terkait dengan good health and well-being, namun juga dapat menangani dampak yang lebih luas dari efek negatif tembakau terhadap masyarakat (Kulik M. et al, 2017;Ahsan A. et al, 2022). Beberapa studi menunjukkan bahwa earmarking dapat berkontribusi signifikan terhadap pengurangan konsumsi produk tembakau dan resiko kesehatan (Chaloupka, 2019;van Walbeek, 2019;Nazar, 2021), dimana dana tersebut dapat digunakan untuk kebijakan kontrol tembakau (kampanye kesehatan publik, program berhenti merokok, wilayah bebas rokok) dan strategi countermarketing (Fakir, 2022;Wang et al, 2016). Namun, program tersebut juga mengalami tantangan terkait dengan intervensi industri tembakau (Balwicki et al 2016), faktor hukum dan politik berupa lemahnya konstruksi hukum (Borges et al, 2020), dan manipulasi industri tembakau berupa penurunan harga, perubahan atribut kemasan rokok, dan diskriminasi harga (Ross et al, 2017).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified