2011
DOI: 10.5465/amle.2009.0185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economics Education and Greed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
154
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 256 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
11
154
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is argued that students in economics are taught models based on rational choice theory, where actors are described as self-interested rational profit-maximizing actors, which in turn affect their view about themselves and others. The major dispute in this discussion is whether students in economics become more egoistic during their studies (treatment effect) or whether students with more egoistic values choose to study economics (selection effect) (Carter and Irons 1991;Frank et al 1993;Frank and Schulze 2000;Meier 2003, 2005;Marwell and Ames 1981;Wang et al 2011).…”
Section: Higher Education and Environmental Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is argued that students in economics are taught models based on rational choice theory, where actors are described as self-interested rational profit-maximizing actors, which in turn affect their view about themselves and others. The major dispute in this discussion is whether students in economics become more egoistic during their studies (treatment effect) or whether students with more egoistic values choose to study economics (selection effect) (Carter and Irons 1991;Frank et al 1993;Frank and Schulze 2000;Meier 2003, 2005;Marwell and Ames 1981;Wang et al 2011).…”
Section: Higher Education and Environmental Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exposure of corporate bankruptcies (e.g., Enron, WorldCom), which were at least partly rooted in managerial ethical misbehavior, has confronted business schools with increased demand to educate managers to perceive their profession as an ethically based one (Khurana & Nohria, 2008;Nelson, Poms, & Wolf, 2012;Trank & Rynes, 2003). Despite some discussion of business schools' impact on students' values (Luthar & Karri, 2005;Pascarella & Terenzini, 2005), management education seemingly equips students with all kinds of shortterm profit maximization tools but few moral perspectives (Ghoshal, 2005;Kashyap, Mir, & Iyer, 2006;McPhail, 2001;Wang, Malhotra, & Murnighan, 2011). Companies thus bemoan business schools' failure to deliver normative guidance within the scope of management education (Bennis & O'Toole, 2005;Kashyap et al, 2006), although most discussions involve the management discipline as a whole or focus on business schools and the impact of media and accreditation councils (Trank & Rynes, 2003), without considering the role of individual academics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ferraro, Pfeffer, & Sutton (2005) also discuss the self-fulfilling tenets of economics that make it possible to choose policies by their predicted effects. Wang, Malhotra, & Murnighan (2011) explore how "economics education may have serious, albeit unintended consequences on our students' attitudes toward greed." (Dowd, 2004).…”
Section: The Individual Versus the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%