1996
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.96104s2285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economical test methods for developmental neurobehavioral toxicity.

Abstract: 285-298 (1996)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This test exploits the strong tendency of the immature pup to maintain body contact with the dam and the siblings, which requires adequate sensory, olfactory, motor and ultrasonic communication capabilities as well as adequate associative and discriminative capabilities that allow the pup to become imprinted by the mother's odour, to remember it, and to recognize it among others (Bignami 1996). The lack of changes in this simple form of learning is in agreement with recent findings (Tattoli et al 2001) showing that perinatal exposure to low doses of alcohol did not affect the acquisition of an active avoidance task and hippocampal Long-Term Potentiation (a cellular and molecular model for learning (Shepherd et al 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This test exploits the strong tendency of the immature pup to maintain body contact with the dam and the siblings, which requires adequate sensory, olfactory, motor and ultrasonic communication capabilities as well as adequate associative and discriminative capabilities that allow the pup to become imprinted by the mother's odour, to remember it, and to recognize it among others (Bignami 1996). The lack of changes in this simple form of learning is in agreement with recent findings (Tattoli et al 2001) showing that perinatal exposure to low doses of alcohol did not affect the acquisition of an active avoidance task and hippocampal Long-Term Potentiation (a cellular and molecular model for learning (Shepherd et al 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the start of testing, individual animals were placed in the middle of the open field box and video recorded for 5 min. Video recordings were scored for vertical activity (number of rears), over-all activity (total number of squares crossed), fields entered in both the center and outside squares, and % time spent in the center and outside squares [44].…”
Section: Open Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“….] associative and discriminative capabilities that allow the pup to become imprinted by the mother's odor, to remember it, and to recognize it among others' (Bignami, 1996). Thus, impaired homing performance has been associated with the reciprocal interaction deficits observed in autistic patients early in infancy (Rutgers et al, 2004;Laviola et al, 2009).…”
Section: Rl/+ Mice Display Behavioral Alterations Isomorphic To Asdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the light of the extensive connections between the cerebellum and the neocortex (Strick et al, 2009), we also hypothesized the role of altered cerebrocerebellar loops for behavioral and attentional deficits in rl/+ mice. To investigate the functional significance of this hypothesis, here we compared neonatal social capabilities (homing test, Bignami, 1996) and adult attentional set-shifting abilities in rl/+ and +/+ male mice exposed to 17b-E or vehicle on postnatal day 5. Based on these evidences and on the synergistic role played by the amygdala and the prefrontal cortex in regulating purposive behavior (reviewed in Barbas, 2000;Bechara et al, 2000;Birrell and Brown, 2000) we also measured the number of Parvalbumin-positive, GABAergic inhibitory interneurons in the prefrontal cortex and amygdala, and of PCs in the cerebellum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%