2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0011-9164(02)00687-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economical feasibility of zeolite membranes for industrial scale separations of aromatic hydrocarbons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the significant progress in reproducibly controlling microstructure (Jiang et al, 2004) and improving separation performance (Hedlund et al, 2002;Lai et al, 2003), zeolite membrane technology has had limited commercial impact up to now because the reproduction of ultra-thin and defect-free zeolite membranes on a large scale is difficult (McLeary and Jansen, 2004). Although some of the initial worries regarding flux limitations prohibiting commercial use have been addressed (Meindersma and de Haan, 2002), major concerns remain regarding scale up and manufacturing costs (Coronas and Santamaria, 2004;Caro et al, 2005;.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the significant progress in reproducibly controlling microstructure (Jiang et al, 2004) and improving separation performance (Hedlund et al, 2002;Lai et al, 2003), zeolite membrane technology has had limited commercial impact up to now because the reproduction of ultra-thin and defect-free zeolite membranes on a large scale is difficult (McLeary and Jansen, 2004). Although some of the initial worries regarding flux limitations prohibiting commercial use have been addressed (Meindersma and de Haan, 2002), major concerns remain regarding scale up and manufacturing costs (Coronas and Santamaria, 2004;Caro et al, 2005;.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vapour pressure of 8.0 × 10 5 and 9.8 × 10 5 Pa for 2,3-DMP and 2,4-DMP were used, respectively, at the operation temperature of 458 K. The solution of the equations yields a membrane area of about 20,000 m 2 . Meindersma and de Haan [18] in their work on aromatic compounds separation using zeolite membranes estimated membrane areas ranging from 60,800 to 136,500 m 2 depending on the purity requirement. A feed of 300 metric tonne per hour was used in their work, which is about six times higher than the amount of feed sent to the membrane unit of the present work.…”
Section: Membrane Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years pervaporation separation, has emerged as relatively simple alternatives to greatly water/organic and organic/water separation applications 2. Specifically there have been growing research interest in the application of pervaporation separation process with considerable innovative possibilities in the area of biotechnology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically there have been growing research interest in the application of pervaporation separation process with considerable innovative possibilities in the area of biotechnology. Particularly, the combination of bioreactor and pervaporation membrane has potential in the longer term as an alternative to conventional batch processes 2, 3. However, a major difficulty limits pervaporation commercialization, namely, the deficiency of proper membrane materials for this application 4.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%