1980
DOI: 10.2307/3003376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic Welfare and the Production of Information by a Monopolist: The Case of Drug Testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, e ~ > e* as previous literature, Arrow (1962), Kwerel (1980), andNelson (1959), would suggest. However, with imperfect liability and linear demand, e ~ and e* cannot be ordered.…”
supporting
confidence: 50%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, e ~ > e* as previous literature, Arrow (1962), Kwerel (1980), andNelson (1959), would suggest. However, with imperfect liability and linear demand, e ~ and e* cannot be ordered.…”
supporting
confidence: 50%
“…Next, it is of interest to compare the first-best level of testing effort with that which is chosen by a monopolist. In Kwerel (1980) and in other contexts, for example Nelson (1959) and Arrow (1962), monopolistic firms tend to produce less than the socially optimal amount of information. In the present model, IV" < 0 implies that …”
Section: W(e) = E(ts I (A*) -E) = ~[Otsa(qa) + (1 -O)tsb(qb )]mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Instead, it is relevant to ask who in the population should be given the treatment. See the paper by Kwerel 5 for an early discussion in the economics literature of this problem and also chapter 24 of Statistical Issues in Drug Development 6 . However, if Assumption 3 applies, then the distinction between conditional and marginal estimates is moot anyway.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%