2002
DOI: 10.4337/9781781009727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
693
0
46

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,144 publications
(744 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
693
0
46
Order By: Relevance
“…The values of the attributes vary across choice scenarios, and by observing the choices people make it is possible to infer their preferences over the attributes of the goods under study. DCEs are commonly used to identify people's preferences in a variety of non-market situations/services/commodities (Bateman et al 2002;Hensher, Rose, and Greene 2005;Louviere, Hensher, and Swait 2000) and have been widely utilized in health economics (Gerard et al, 2003;King et al, 2007;Ryan et al, 2008;Lancsar and Louviere, 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of the attributes vary across choice scenarios, and by observing the choices people make it is possible to infer their preferences over the attributes of the goods under study. DCEs are commonly used to identify people's preferences in a variety of non-market situations/services/commodities (Bateman et al 2002;Hensher, Rose, and Greene 2005;Louviere, Hensher, and Swait 2000) and have been widely utilized in health economics (Gerard et al, 2003;King et al, 2007;Ryan et al, 2008;Lancsar and Louviere, 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…hypothetical) market for a specific change in an environmental good or service, will reveal their underlying preference for that change through their survey response (Bateman et al, 2002). The value that an individual places on a nonmarket environmental good can be estimated from the largest amount of money they would be prepared to pay for the delivery of the environmental good, their maximum WTP (or alternatively the lowest amount they would be prepared to accept to forgo that same good).…”
Section: Estimating the Benefits Of Reductions In Cyanobacteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was seen as the most credible method and it also reduced incentives for free-riding associated with voluntary contribution mechanisms. The respondents were asked to specify their maximum WTP from a series of values presented on a payment card (Bateman et al, 2002), with the vector of prices anchored by responses elicited through the initial pilot survey.…”
Section: Valuation Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Demnach bildet der Status quo den Ausgangspunkt der Auswahl der Ausprägungen. Bateman et al (2002)), S. 261). Ein "zu großes" Design führt allerdings zu Praktikabilitätshindernissen und zu statistischen Problemen.…”
Section: Spezifikation Umverteilungsrelevanter Attributlevelsunclassified
“…Ermüdungserscheinungen hervorzurufen (vgl. Bateman et al (2002) Wurde die Zahl der Entscheidungssituationen, die einem Individuum präsentiert werden sollen, festgelegt, muss die Art und Weise, wie den Befragten die Alternativen bzw. der Status quo präsentiert werden soll, bestimmt werden.…”
Section: Präsentation Der Choice-setsunclassified