Abstract:African countries face an economic transformation gap. Given the large and growing Chinese presence on the African continent, a fundamental question is whether Chinese firms contribute to, or hinder, economic transformation in Africa. This article conducts a scoping review of over one hundred sources, examining the pathways through which Chinese firms can affect economic transformation. On balance, the literature points to a positive role of Chinese firms. Africa-China trade leads to mixed results, while Chine… Show more
“…The announcement of the Belt and Road Initiative in 2013 brought a shift in the geographical focus of Chinese external policies. Chinese lending to Africa is less central in the Belt and Road Initiative than it had been in the previous decade (Calabrese & Tang, 2020). In this regard, we can observe that there is no direct Chinese commitment to the deployment of the AfCFTA.…”
Section: The Contribution Of China To the Construction Of Infrastruct...mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Second, this approach to international cooperation is consistent with what we may call the "Asian model of development," which focuses on upgrading productive capabilities. Third, this pattern of cooperation intrudes little on internal affairs like policy design or macroeconomic management, and China has consistently followed the rule of non-interference in internal affairs in its diplomacy (Calabrese & Tang, 2020).…”
Section: The Contribution Of China To the Construction Of Infrastruct...mentioning
Africa has become a major arena in the so-called “multiplex world.” The growing presence of China and other emerging countries on the continent in the last two decades has turned Africa into an area in which there are a large number of different patterns of interaction between state and non-state actors. International debates are polarised over whether these new South–South dynamics generate new dependency relations or whether they provide genuine opportunities for transformation. This article focuses on China’s role in the ongoing processes of economic integration in Africa. Far from merely reproducing a neoliberal pattern, this interaction may highlight a certain convergence between the African regional integration projects and China’s desire to promote structural transformation strategies, with investment in infrastructure being an example. However, the article concludes that rather than reinforcing African regional integration, this essentially bilateral and highly pragmatic Chinese strategy may have some indirect returns on regional integration but is actually showing some signs of decline.
“…The announcement of the Belt and Road Initiative in 2013 brought a shift in the geographical focus of Chinese external policies. Chinese lending to Africa is less central in the Belt and Road Initiative than it had been in the previous decade (Calabrese & Tang, 2020). In this regard, we can observe that there is no direct Chinese commitment to the deployment of the AfCFTA.…”
Section: The Contribution Of China To the Construction Of Infrastruct...mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Second, this approach to international cooperation is consistent with what we may call the "Asian model of development," which focuses on upgrading productive capabilities. Third, this pattern of cooperation intrudes little on internal affairs like policy design or macroeconomic management, and China has consistently followed the rule of non-interference in internal affairs in its diplomacy (Calabrese & Tang, 2020).…”
Section: The Contribution Of China To the Construction Of Infrastruct...mentioning
Africa has become a major arena in the so-called “multiplex world.” The growing presence of China and other emerging countries on the continent in the last two decades has turned Africa into an area in which there are a large number of different patterns of interaction between state and non-state actors. International debates are polarised over whether these new South–South dynamics generate new dependency relations or whether they provide genuine opportunities for transformation. This article focuses on China’s role in the ongoing processes of economic integration in Africa. Far from merely reproducing a neoliberal pattern, this interaction may highlight a certain convergence between the African regional integration projects and China’s desire to promote structural transformation strategies, with investment in infrastructure being an example. However, the article concludes that rather than reinforcing African regional integration, this essentially bilateral and highly pragmatic Chinese strategy may have some indirect returns on regional integration but is actually showing some signs of decline.
“…Indeed, manufacturing is more prominent in Chinese FDI than US FDI in Africa (Eom et al, 2017). Similarly, Chinese firms have contributed to the enhancement of workers' skills in SSA host countries, and knowledge transfers occur (Calabrese and Tang, 2020). Equally, it may be considered that the BRI has a developmental dimension that is similar to China's domestic development model, i.e., "pragmatically hybrid" (Alves and Lee, 2022).…”
Section: China's Domestic Developmental Paradigm As a Driver Of Afric...mentioning
Une question récurrente dans la littérature sur les relations entre la Chine et l’Afrique Sub-Saharienne est de comprendre si l’engagement chinois constitue un paradigme alternatif aux modèles « mainstream » relatifs aux théories ou politiques économiques – par exemple ceux promus par les institutions financières internationales. La Chine a en effet été analysée comme un modèle de développement original partageant de nombreux éléments avec ceux ayant caractérisés les Etats « développementaux » est-asiatiques, notamment des politiques économiques interventionnistes (politiques industrielles). Dans ce contexte, cet article argue que les principaux domaines des relations économiques Chine-Afrique – commerce, investissement et financement du développement – n’illustrent pas le modèle de la Chine comme Etat « développemental », étant surtout animés par des motivations de marché ou de coopération au développement. Certaines de leurs dimensions, cependant, illustrent le modèle développemental spécifique de la Chine.
“…Lin et Wang (2017) dénoncent par exemple le manque de transparence, le recours systématique à l'aide conditionnelle, l'absence de débouchés créés pour les travailleurs locaux et la médiocrité des normes professionnelles et environnementales associées aux investissements chinois. À l'avenir, la pleine exploitation de ces opportunités financières exigera une planification stratégique et une approche concertée de la part des gouvernements africains pour veiller à ce qu'ils ne soient pas tenus par des engagements de long terme contraires à leurs intérêts nationaux (Calabrese, 2019 ;Calabrese et Xiaoyang, 2020).…”
Section: Le Déploiement De Politiques Complémentaires Peut Orienter L...unclassified
Le rapport économique Dynamiques du développement en Afrique 2021 : Transformation digitale et qualité de l'emploi a été préparé conjointement par la Commission de l'Union africaine (CUA) et le Centre de développement de l'OCDE. Il est publié sous la responsabilité du président de la Commission de l'Union africaine, S.E. Moussa Faki Mahamat, et du Secrétaire général de l'OCDE, S.E. Angel Gurría. Sa rédaction a bénéficié des orientations données par S.E. Victor Harison, Commissaire aux Affaires économiques de l'Union africaine, et Mario Pezzini, directeur du Centre de développement et Conseiller spécial auprès du Secrétaire général de l'OCDE chargé du développement. Le rapport a été supervisé par Jean-Denis Gabikini, directeur par intérim du Département des affaires économiques, et
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.