“…Judged by such criteria, the study of policy-making might be thought of as lacking in rigour. True, the public choice literature (see Mueller, 1979, for a survey) applies the methodology of neoclassical economics to the political arena, but despite the large and growing body of literature on public choice the substantive results are relatively limited, and there are serious grounds for questioning the applicability of the neoclassical paradigm to the study of policy-making or politics generally (see, e.g., Toye, 1976). A more specific problem with the public choice approach concerns the arguments of the utility function that individuals are adjudged to maximize; the appropriate arguments are less clearly defined in a political as opposed to an economic context, and are often harder to quantify.…”