Drinking water treatment operators and municipalities face the difficult task of producing potable water while keeping rates affordable (Gullick, 2017). Essential to meeting these objectives is the selection of an appropriate treatment technology, based on, among other considerations, the quality of the treatment plant's source water and expected output levels (National Research Council, 1997). Subject to the technology, operators manage the treatment process to meet cost, performance, and safety objectives.Understanding the determinants of drinking water treatment costs can, thus, support cost-effective decisions (i.e., least cost options) related to technology selection, production, and the treatment process. Researchers can, with the appropriate data, estimate functions that relate treatment costs to their determinants, such as production output, input prices, reservoir levels, and measures of source water quality. When these cost functions include source water quality, researchers can calculate avoided-cost benefits from improved source water quality and can help determine whether source water protection (SWP) would be a cost-effective component of producing potable water (Heberling et al., 2015;. SWP reduces risks by safeguarding drinking water sources from contamination prior to any treatment. Examples of SWP actions include agricultural or stormwater best management practices, conservation easements, and education of nearby landowners.Early influential papers focused on the effect of turbidity, a measure of water clarity or amount of suspended particles in the water, on costs; although, in some cases, these studies also evaluated other water quality measures like pesticide load, temperature, pH, and chemical contamination (