2000
DOI: 10.1006/juec.1999.2143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic Structure and Local Growth: France, 1984–1993

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

40
433
6
54

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 463 publications
(533 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
40
433
6
54
Order By: Relevance
“…Better territorial units used in the empirical literature are the functional urban region just for main urban centres at the European level (Cheshire, 1990 andCheshire andMagrini 2000), the local labour system in Italy (Paci and Usai, 1999), the basin d'emploi in France (Combes, 2000). 5 In future applications we will attempt to disaggregate some nations which are currently at the NUTS0 level (Finland, Denmark and Norway in particular).…”
Section: The Geography Of Innovative Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Better territorial units used in the empirical literature are the functional urban region just for main urban centres at the European level (Cheshire, 1990 andCheshire andMagrini 2000), the local labour system in Italy (Paci and Usai, 1999), the basin d'emploi in France (Combes, 2000). 5 In future applications we will attempt to disaggregate some nations which are currently at the NUTS0 level (Finland, Denmark and Norway in particular).…”
Section: The Geography Of Innovative Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of industry structures for economic development has been intensively discussed in the literature (Gleaser 1992;Henderson et al 1995;Combes 2000). A key issue in this debate is knowledge spillovers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exceptions were new high-tech industries where Jacobs externalities appeared to be dominant. Combes (2000) in his analysis for France for the time period 1984-5 1993 found distinct effects for the manufacturing and the service sector.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Empirical results have been heterogeneous and, while industrial concentrations have not always been registered in a positive relationship with growth, it is diversity and competition that are more the main factors advancing growth. In fact, many authors identify an alternative relationship between industrial specialization and growth, often depending on local industry life cycles and size (Combes, 2000;Rosenthal & Strange, 2004). Most studies on spillovers, in any case, are unanimous in their conclusions that either intra-industry or inter-industry externalities are important and are strongly bounded in space (Feldman, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%