2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11109-021-09694-x
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic Self-Interest and Americans’ Redistributive, Class, and Racial Attitudes: The Case of Economic Insecurity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both the material and symbolic threat theoretical orientations provide plausible reasons for perceptions of economic threat, whether stemming from perceived deprivation or racial grievance, to be associated with symbolic and affective racial attitudes. Material threat stresses competitive self-interest motives (Melcher, 2020, 2021) whereas symbolic threat stresses racialized perceptions of economic justice (Sides et al, 2019). Admittedly, the present studies cannot distinguish between these two mechanisms.…”
Section: Perceived Economic Interest and Racial Attitudesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Both the material and symbolic threat theoretical orientations provide plausible reasons for perceptions of economic threat, whether stemming from perceived deprivation or racial grievance, to be associated with symbolic and affective racial attitudes. Material threat stresses competitive self-interest motives (Melcher, 2020, 2021) whereas symbolic threat stresses racialized perceptions of economic justice (Sides et al, 2019). Admittedly, the present studies cannot distinguish between these two mechanisms.…”
Section: Perceived Economic Interest and Racial Attitudesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measuring individuals’ self-interest, particularly in relation to financial well-being, has proven to be the subject of some scholarly debate as well. Melcher (2020) argues that “the variables often used to measure economic self-interest do not follow conceptually from the theoretical claims of the political economic frame,” and that “variables that are often interpreted as sociotropic can plausibly be interpreted as measuring individual-level economic self-interest.” He advocates instead for measures that capture affective economic insecurity (Melcher, 2021) and those that capture perceived self-interest rather than those that assume that “respondents should feel economic anxiety” (Melcher, 2020). With this in mind, it is important to use measures that capture the true perceived fear of economic despair or that capture the sense that one may personally face negative consequences if power dynamics between racial groups shift.…”
Section: Perceived Economic Interest and Racial Attitudesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The right-hand panel shows estimates from a series of linear regression models, in which we regress BES variables that measure respondents' attitudes to and experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic on the occupational proximity-risk of respondents. In these regressions, we standardise all outcomes, as well as the occupational proximity-risk variable, to ones (Melcher 2021), and this might be because individuals are not aware of their objective unemployment risks (such as occupational unemployment rates). This is unlikely to be a limitation for the use of OccP roximityRisk as this measure captures an occupation's proximity to others, a fact known to any individual (unlike, for example, occupational unemployment rates).…”
Section: Occupational Health Risk Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the main arguments in the political economy literature is that considerations of material self-interest drive preferences for redistribution(Franko et al, 2013;Meltzer & Richard, 1981;Owens & Pedulla, 2014;Rehm, 2009;Rueda, 2018). 1 1 However, the empirical evidence on the impact of self-interest considerations on redistribution and social policy preferences is ambiguous (for short discussions of the respective findings, seeMargalit, 2013;Melcher, 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%