Economic Sectors as Discursive Resources for Civil Society Collaboration

Koschmann, Matthew A.

doi:10.1080/01463373.2015.1103295

Cited by 6 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 47 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Trittin & Schoeneborn (2017) aim to work on diversity as polyphony since a point of view can be said by several people or one person have several points of view, which generates a development in the organization. Koschmann (2016) is based on the administration of communication in different civil societies, taking into account its various stakeholders with their consequent different points of view and objectives. Thus, this research takes communication as the key to managing different civil societies.…”

Section: Leavesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Organizational communication: a bibliometric analysis from 2005 to 2020

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of this article is to perform a systematic review about Organizational Communication from 2005 to 2020, therefore, it is carried out a bibliometric analysis of nets and co-citations of documents published in WoS and Scopus. It uses the tree analogy to separate the documents in: 1. “roots”: the documents located in this section are the intellectual base of a knowledge field, 2. “trunk”: the structural documents, and finally 3. “leaves”: the most recent documents that have cited the authors located in “roots” and “trunk”. Thanks to this scheme it is facilitated the visualization and subsequent analysis of the documents. It should be emphasized that in the process of Organizational Communication review there are some data that complement this article: scientific production by years, scientific production by countries, most cited authors, and sources with the highest number of publications and their relevance. Findings evidence the usefulness of tree analogy to express the epistemological evolution of OC through the years. In addition, the used methodology presents considerable opportunities for the creation of bibliometric analysis, which has applications in different knowledge scientific fields.

show abstract

Section: Leavesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Organizational communication: a bibliometric analysis from 2005 to 2020

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Yet, being an active member of the collaboration is not only about acting collaboratively (Gray, 1989). Research has shown that, even when partners face, for example, cultural incompatibilities (Kanter, 1994); competitive, opportunistic and individualistic spirits and excessive control by other partners (Huxham and Vangen, 2005;Vangen and Huxham, 2003); negative attitudes and opposition to change (Olson et al, 2012); external pressures (Huxham, 1996); different protocols and structures (Bouwen and Taillieu, 2004); or sector differences which relate to different values, norms and ways of understanding the world (Koschmann, 2016;Olson et al, 2012), they can still be part of an effective collaboration. A smaller part of the IOC research has also illustrated that some tasks require less collaborative efforts than others (Lafond et al, 2011) while individual efforts complement collaborative work (Bruns, 2013) and assist partners in achieving the collaboration aims (Jassawalla and Sashital, 1998).…”

Section: Ioc's Psychosocial Spacesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Why should we collaborate? Exploring partners’ interactions in the psychosocial spaces of an inter-organisational collaboration

Kourti

2017

Scandinavian Journal of Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Open University's repository of research publications and other research outputs Why should we collaborate? Exploring partners' interactions in the psychosocial spaces of an inter-organisational collaboration Journal Item How to cite: Kourti, Isidora (2017). Why should we collaborate? Exploring partners' interactions in the psychosocial spaces of an inter-organisational collaboration. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 33(2) pp. 93-101. For guidance on citations see FAQs.

show abstract

“…Studies from the discourse tradition draw on case studies to capture participants' lived experiences of collaborating that highlight dynamics of discourse and language use such as participants' coping with the tensions of collaborating (e.g., Barbour & James, 2015;Cooren, Brummans, & Charrieras, 2008;Koschmann, 2013Koschmann, , 2016. For example, Maguire and Hardy (2005) conducted a case study of a Canadian HIV/AIDS multi-sector collaboration comprised of various NGOs and pharmaceutical companies.…”

Section: Ioc Research Traditionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Advancing the New Communications Framework for HIV/AIDS: The Communicative Constitution of HIV/AIDS Networks in Tanzania’s HIV/AIDS NGO Sector

Olufowote¹,

Aranda²,

Wang³

et al. 2017

SMC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although health communication research on HIV/AIDS has acknowledged the work of HIV/AIDS non-governmental organizations (NGOs), we know little about how such NGOs are collaborating in their response to the epidemic in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). UNAIDS estimated that over two-thirds of world-wide HIV infections and AIDS-related deaths take place in SSA and normative models have highlighted organizational collaborations as an important part of the response to public health risks and crises. This study advanced the New Communications Framework for HIV/AIDS by drawing on a constitutive model of communication to develop a discursive perspective on HIV/AIDS NGO collaborations. Analyses of interviews with 36 leaders of Tanzanian HIV/AIDS NGOs resulted in (a) networks of organizations of people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) and (b) networks expressing the following identities: as single entities that unify PLWHA organizations in/across administrative divisions, as structures for reaching grassroots PLWHA and facilitating their participation in decision-making forums at various scales, and as vehicles for various social impacts such as advocacy for PLWHA.

show abstract

Economic Sectors as Discursive Resources for Civil Society Collaboration

Cited by 6 publications

References 47 publications

Organizational communication: a bibliometric analysis from 2005 to 2020

Organizational communication: a bibliometric analysis from 2005 to 2020

Why should we collaborate? Exploring partners’ interactions in the psychosocial spaces of an inter-organisational collaboration

Advancing the New Communications Framework for HIV/AIDS: The Communicative Constitution of HIV/AIDS Networks in Tanzania’s HIV/AIDS NGO Sector

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About