2021
DOI: 10.1108/sampj-05-2020-0158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic policy uncertainty and corporate social responsibility performance: evidence from China

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this paper is to show how the external issue of economic policy uncertainty (EPU) affects enterprises’ corporate social responsibility (CSR). Design/methodology/approach This study investigates the relationship between EPU and CSR based on the Chinese capital market from 2010 to 2018. Following the most recent studies focused on economic policy uncertainty, this paper uses the news-based method proposed by Baker et al. (2016) to measure EPU and explore the effect of EPU on CSR, as well… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, using data from Chinese firms, Zhao et al. (2021) find that high policy uncertainty diminishes CSR activities, particularly in firms where the government holds significantly large ownership stakes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, using data from Chinese firms, Zhao et al. (2021) find that high policy uncertainty diminishes CSR activities, particularly in firms where the government holds significantly large ownership stakes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Although the literature on the EPU–CSR nexus is at the infancy stage, the existing evidence are inconclusive (e.g. Vural-Yavaş, 2020; Zhao et al. , 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CRH is a control variable to control differences between companies that experienced high-speed railway openings in the full sample period and those that did not. Following Zhang et al and Adhikari [8,9], firm size, return on asset, cash holding ratio, leverage, and effective tax rate are used to control the availability of economic resources at the firm level; market-to-book value, R&D intensity, and firm age control the different life cycles of public companies since firms in different life cycles may choose diversified CSR strategies [19]; the equity nature of the firm's ultimate controller is used to control the SOE effect since the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission (SASAC) will provide favorable evaluation scores for stated-owned enterprises taking more social responsibility [42]; institutional investor shareholding ratio is used to control the corporate governance quality [43]; and the annual GDP in the company's location region is chosen to control differences in regional economic development. Year and Ind are year dummy and industry dummy, respectively, and ε is the residual term.…”
Section: Baseline Regression Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, holding other things equal, by alleviating or aggravating information asymmetry, changes in companies' external information environment will lead to better or worse CSR performance, depended on the initial motivation for firms' CSR activities. In finding such factors affecting CSR performance through changing enterprises' information environment, while recent studies emphasize the role of the country-level economic policy uncertainty [18,19], significant regional economic changes, especially transportation infrastructure investment, can also have impacts because such construction effectively decreases field investigation difficulties, accelerates information exchanges, and thus improves the firm-level information environment. From the perspective of high-speed railway openings, this study narrows the research gap between the regional economic factors and listed companies' CSR performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%