Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2001
DOI: 10.2307/2676223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic News and Bond Prices: Evidence from the U.S. Treasury Market

Abstract: This paper uses intraday data from the interdealer government bond market to investigate the effects of scheduled macroeconomic announcements on prices, trading volume, and bid-ask spreads. We find that 17 public news releases, as measured by the surprise in the announced quantity, have a significant impact on the price of at least one of the following instruments: a three-month bill, a two-year note, a 10-year note, and a 30-year bond. These effects vary significantly according to maturity. Public news can ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

47
585
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 787 publications
(645 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
47
585
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 5-minute frequency is robust to microstructure noise and offers sufficiently high frequency information to properly evaluate the impact of specific events. Moreover, this frequency is consistent with previous seminal contributions such as [5] and [13].…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…The 5-minute frequency is robust to microstructure noise and offers sufficiently high frequency information to properly evaluate the impact of specific events. Moreover, this frequency is consistent with previous seminal contributions such as [5] and [13].…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…While this may be expected in case of quantitative information on important economic statistics, such as those regularly released by important institutional agencies (e.g., Stickel and Verrecchia (1994); Balduzzi et al (2001); Kim and Sheen (2001); Pritamani and Singal (2001), Brenner et al (2009);Tetlock (2010Tetlock ( , 2011, it is less likely to find a positive impact of qualitative information, such as journalists' opinion or report of market rumors, which is subjective (Coval and Shumway (2001);Schindler (2007)). Nevertheless, empirical evidence is also growing on this.…”
Section: Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13. The quality of the MMS data as measures of expectations has been verified by previous authors-see, for example, Balduzzi, Elton, and Green (2001) and Andersen et al (2003). 14.…”
Section: Macroeconomic Data Releasesmentioning
confidence: 71%