2020
DOI: 10.1136/bmjophth-2019-000426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic modelling of immediately sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS) in the National Health Service based on possible improvements in surgical efficiency

Abstract: ObjectiveTo test a hypothesis that operating room (OR) productivity in the National Health Service (NHS) can be improved with the introduction of immediately sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS).Methods and analysisPreviously published time and motion data of 140 unilateral cataract surgeries conducted at five different NHS locations were reanalysed to construct a hypothetical model where only ISBCS (±one unilateral case) were conducted while maintaining time durations of all key tasks previously stud… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This quite high percentage is encouraging, suggesting the limited routine implementation of ISBCS in the National Health Service (NHS) is possible, with all its associated cost savings [15][16][17] and potential for improving surgical productivity. 18 Under a quarter agreed/strongly agreed that they had any familiarity with the concept of ISBCS (table 2). Although, there were no strong correlations between this factor and the other ISBCS questions, given the reported lack of knowledge of ISBCS, patient education in this area is required and further studies needed to see if by informing patients of the nature of ISBCS and the very small risk of bilateral sight-threatening complications, acceptance well above 50% can be achieved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This quite high percentage is encouraging, suggesting the limited routine implementation of ISBCS in the National Health Service (NHS) is possible, with all its associated cost savings [15][16][17] and potential for improving surgical productivity. 18 Under a quarter agreed/strongly agreed that they had any familiarity with the concept of ISBCS (table 2). Although, there were no strong correlations between this factor and the other ISBCS questions, given the reported lack of knowledge of ISBCS, patient education in this area is required and further studies needed to see if by informing patients of the nature of ISBCS and the very small risk of bilateral sight-threatening complications, acceptance well above 50% can be achieved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…16 17 By reducing patient operating room (OR) transfer times and OR preparation times, ISBCS has the potential to increase efficiency, allowing more CS cases to undergo surgery within a given time. 18 Surgeon opinions with regards to ISBCS have been published, [19][20][21] but there is no information regarding patient attitudes/concerns. To address this discrepancy, we designed this study.…”
Section: Key Messagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 Hospitals achieve higher productivity and cost savings of more than 30% when performing ISBCS instead of delayed sequential bilateral cataracts surgery (DSBCS). 3 , 4 , 5 The new normal of the COVID-19 era requires extra spacing, cleaning, and time between patients, resulting in increased costs. When considering the additional patient costs for travel, family and caregiver time, and absence from work with the extra postoperative visits and recovery requirements of DSBCS, the cost efficiency is even greater with ISBCS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…47.3% and 37.2% were concerned about contagion in the hospital or on their journey to/from hospital, respectively. 26.6% were more positive towards immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS), which might help surgical throughput [ 5 ]. There was a positive correlation between worsening QOL and willingness to attend ( r = 0.236, p = 0.001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%