2015
DOI: 10.1080/14459795.2015.1046468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic mobility moderates the effect of relative deprivation on financial gambling motives and disordered gambling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to previous research problem gambling cumulates in lower socio-economic groups, especially among those problem gamblers that have lower levels of income, education, or both (e.g., Cavion, Wong, & Zangeneh, 2008;Orford 2011;Orford, Wardle, Griffiths, Sproston, & Erens, 2010;Reith, 2003;Volberg, Abbott, Rönnberg, & Munck, 2001;Welte, Barnes, Wieczorek, Tidwell, & Parker, 2004). Poverty or relative personal deprivation can trigger gambling (Blalock, Just, & Simon, 2004;Callan, Ellard, Shead, & Hodgins, 2008;Schissel, 2001;Shaffer, Freed, & Healea, 2002;Tabri, Dupuis, Kim, & Wohl, 2015). According to the problem gamblers receiving welfare benefits prior to gambling problems in this study, gambling was indeed at least partly perceived as a way to win money to enhance their livelihood.…”
Section: Non-governmental and Controlling Financial Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to previous research problem gambling cumulates in lower socio-economic groups, especially among those problem gamblers that have lower levels of income, education, or both (e.g., Cavion, Wong, & Zangeneh, 2008;Orford 2011;Orford, Wardle, Griffiths, Sproston, & Erens, 2010;Reith, 2003;Volberg, Abbott, Rönnberg, & Munck, 2001;Welte, Barnes, Wieczorek, Tidwell, & Parker, 2004). Poverty or relative personal deprivation can trigger gambling (Blalock, Just, & Simon, 2004;Callan, Ellard, Shead, & Hodgins, 2008;Schissel, 2001;Shaffer, Freed, & Healea, 2002;Tabri, Dupuis, Kim, & Wohl, 2015). According to the problem gamblers receiving welfare benefits prior to gambling problems in this study, gambling was indeed at least partly perceived as a way to win money to enhance their livelihood.…”
Section: Non-governmental and Controlling Financial Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applied to the context of gambling, some players with perfectionistic tendencies may develop gambling problems when financial success-a societal ideal, especially in Western societies (e.g., Grouzet et al, 2005)-becomes a primary goal of play, as gambling for financial gain is a known risk factor for disordered gambling (see Lister, Nower, & Wohl, 2016;Tabri, Dupuis, Kim, & Wohl, 2015). Other players with perfectionistic tendencies may develop gambling problems when they gamble as a means to cope with stress in their lives-another well-established risk factor for disordered gambling (for a review, see Milosevic & Ledgerwood, 2010).…”
Section: Perfectionism and Disordered Gamblingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possibility is that stress might play a bigger role in the aetiology of pathological gambling rather than more general gambling. A third possibility is that the association between personal relative deprivation and general gambling is moderated by perceptions of economic mobility derived from gambling (vs. more conventional means; e.g., Tabri et al, ). Those who feel relatively deprived may seek high‐risk options (like gambling) to fulfil their economic needs when acceptable low‐risk options are unavailable (consistent with risk‐sensitivity theory; e.g., Mishra et al, , ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further research is also necessary to examine the boundary conditions (and potential moderators) of the deprivation-stress-gambling relationship. Multiple individual differences may be relevant, including general risk-propensity (Mishra et al, 2010), materialism (Fang & Mowen, 2009), perceived economic mobility (Tabri et al, 2015), and financial self-concept (Tabri et al, 2017), among others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation