Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.11.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic load dispatch using krill herd algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
81
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 11 reports the comparison of the best cost and the value of N FES from methods. It can see that the proposed method can yield optimal solutions as good as others excluding FA with the worst results and the proposed method's N FES is also the lowest value excluding comparison to ALHN and EALHN, which are not Table 12 can see that KHA methods in [23] are the best ones with the surprised lowest BCI compared to the proposed method; however, the validation confirmation of solutions cannot be done due to the lack of optimal solution report in [23]. Compared to popular methods such as PSO, GA, TSA (Tabu search algorithm), and FA, the proposed method is better in terms of lower cost and lower N FES .…”
Section: Comparisons Of Test Casementioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Table 11 reports the comparison of the best cost and the value of N FES from methods. It can see that the proposed method can yield optimal solutions as good as others excluding FA with the worst results and the proposed method's N FES is also the lowest value excluding comparison to ALHN and EALHN, which are not Table 12 can see that KHA methods in [23] are the best ones with the surprised lowest BCI compared to the proposed method; however, the validation confirmation of solutions cannot be done due to the lack of optimal solution report in [23]. Compared to popular methods such as PSO, GA, TSA (Tabu search algorithm), and FA, the proposed method is better in terms of lower cost and lower N FES .…”
Section: Comparisons Of Test Casementioning
confidence: 84%
“…The observation of BCI can lead 14 Complexity to an evaluation that the proposed method is slightly better than most methods (the improvement is from 0.0002% to +0.1030%). KHA4 [23], OBKHA [24], and EMA [30] have the same cost as the proposed method, but α-MFA [53] has slightly lower cost than IFA. However, the recalculated cost of α-MFA [53] is $15445.46, which is higher than the cost of the proposed method.…”
Section: Comparison and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The motion induced is dynamically adjusted by the target swarm density, local swarm density and a repulsive swarm density. Mathematically the velocity of i-th krill is defined by [46,47]: …”
Section: Movement Affected By Other Krill Individualsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been plenty of research on the determination of optimal power flow (OPF) for various power system objectives, such as the generation cost, emissions, and transmission losses (see, for example, [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] for individual objectives, and [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] for single-area multi-objective systems). A number of approaches to the multi-area economic dispatch problem under various power system operating constraints are discussed in [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%