2010
DOI: 10.1017/s0020818310000068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic Liberalization via IMF Structural Adjustment: Sowing the Seeds of Civil War?

Abstract: Previous studies that have explored the effects of economic liberalization on civil war have employed aggregate measures of openness and have failed to account for potential endogeneity bias. In this research note, we suggest two improvements to the study of the relationship between liberalization and civil war. First, emphasizing that it is processes that systematically create new economic winners and losers rather than particular levels of economic openness that have the potential to generate conflict, we co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15 Existing studies suggest that programs can be highly disruptive. For example, Hartzell et al (2010) have found an association between the adoption of IMF programs and the onset of civil war.…”
Section: Variables the First Takes A Value Of One If The Rating Of Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Existing studies suggest that programs can be highly disruptive. For example, Hartzell et al (2010) have found an association between the adoption of IMF programs and the onset of civil war.…”
Section: Variables the First Takes A Value Of One If The Rating Of Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These initiatives primarily include reduction in expenditure on social sector and development spending (Nooruddin and Simmons 2006). Some find that acceptance of IMF and World Bank programs are associated with a decline in government respect for human rights and even the onset of civil war because of the harmful neoliberal policies they push (Abouharb and Cingranelli 2007;Hartzell, Hoddie, and Bauer 2010). Others simply model the relationship between economic openness, often measured as trade and capital accounts openness, and conflict as a struggle between the winners and losers of global competition (Bussmann, Scheuthle, and Schneider 2005).…”
Section: The Skepticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 It must be mentioned, that a growth focus under the premise of economic liberalization, as e.g. driven by the International Monetary Fund in recent decades, is suspected to have had notable adverse e ects, such as civil unrest (Hartzell et al, 2010) and higher income disparity (Ostry and Berg, 2011). 3 is points to the question of radicalism vs. incrementalism, particularly with respect to a policy level (see e.g.…”
Section: Big Challenges and Small Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%