Economic incentives to use fertilizer on maize under differing agro-ecological conditions in Burkina Faso

Abstract

Increasing agricultural productivity while protecting natural resources depends on proper understanding of farmers' incentives to use intensification strategies, including fertilizer. Using a large-scale household dataset collected in rural Burkina Faso, we examined how the response of maize yield to fertilizer, and thus the economic incentives for its use, varied according to agroecological conditions. We employed a Control Function Approach with Correlated Random Effects in order to test and control for endogeneity of fertilizer use, measuring agro-ecological conditions at several scales. We investigated the profitability of fertilizer use with value-cost ratios. We found that productivity and marginal effects of fertilizer differ significantly according to agroecological conditions. Micro-variation appeared to be more critical than the definition of agro-ecological zone. Burkinabe soils are severely degraded and would benefit from greater application of fertilizer. However, at full market prices, fertilizer use was unprofitable. Though it was profitable with subsidized prices, transaction costs diminish the benefits of the subsidy. Profitability of fertilizer use with maize varied across agro-ecological conditions, even for field plots located in the same agro-ecological zone. Our results confirm that policy makers need to be cautious when generalizing across regions or drawing policy recommendations from a single agro-ecological zone because crop responses and economic incentives vary widely.

Farming on the fringe: Shallow groundwater dynamics and irrigation scheduling for maize and wheat in Bangladesh’s coastal delta

“…Munns and Gilliham (2015) reported on the economic constraints associated with soil salinity including reduced profitability. Our data also corroborate other findings of smallholder farmers including an econometric analysis of maize in Burkina Faso (Theriault et al, 2018) and an experimental study in the Mekong Delta (Witt et al, 2006). The latter study suggested that the economic incentives for fertilizer use varied depending on prevailing biophysical circumstances in locations in which farmers grew their crops.…”

An in‐depth examination of maize yield response to fertilizer in Central Malawi reveals low profits and too many weeds

“…In addition to weed timing, we allow the yield response to be conditional on regimes defined by whether soil characteristics are above or below some critical value. The use of threshold modeling to understand soil effects on yield and fertilizer response is increasingly common when combining data from farm surveys and soil laboratories (Burke et al., 2017; 2019; Marenya & Barrett, 2009a; 2009b; Matsumoto & Yamano, 2013; Theriault, Smale, & Haider, 2018). While most previous studies have focused on just one variable and two regimes (e.g., “high” or “low” carbon), we consider two soil variables.…”

The 21st Century Agriculture: When Rice Research Draws Attention to Climate Variability and How Weedy Rice and Underutilized Grains Come in Handy

“…To encourage low-and medium-income rice producers to engage in sustainable farming practices, many of the current agricultural policies will need to be revised. New policies should eliminate any existing subsidies that drive producers to overuse resources [121]. For example, incentives that encourage the use of fertilizers need to be removed [122].…”