2018
DOI: 10.1186/s40008-017-0103-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic implications of the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) on Pakistan: a CGE approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the significant advantages of the Global CGE model is its ability to relate cross-linkages within the economy [44]. The MyGTAP model has also been used to examine policies in Pakistan [46,47], Nepal [48], Oman [49] and Nigeria [50] Based on neoclassical theory, the model assumes perfect competition in the market. Therefore, market adopts constant returns to scale, where producers' decisions are based on profit maximization and cost minimization, while consumers strive to achieve utility maximization [51].…”
Section: Economic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the significant advantages of the Global CGE model is its ability to relate cross-linkages within the economy [44]. The MyGTAP model has also been used to examine policies in Pakistan [46,47], Nepal [48], Oman [49] and Nigeria [50] Based on neoclassical theory, the model assumes perfect competition in the market. Therefore, market adopts constant returns to scale, where producers' decisions are based on profit maximization and cost minimization, while consumers strive to achieve utility maximization [51].…”
Section: Economic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the subjects of this kind of research (and, accordingly, the factors of influence) were identified: foreign direct investment (Rafat, 2018); the level of development of stock market institutions (Fufa & Kim, 2018); membership of countries in international economic integration associations (in particular, the TRANS-Pacific partner-ship (Khan et al, 2018) and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Karimi & Daiari, 2018)); the level of openness of national economies (Lee & Kim, 2018); the level of efficiency of natural resource potential and energy efficiency (Baloch et al, 2018); innovation, development of science and education (Batabyal & Yoo, 2018); demographic and urban processes (Ibrahiem, 2018;Cruz & Ahmed, 2018;Frick & Rodriguez-Pose, 2018); state fiscal policy (Esteve & Tamarit, 2018); the dynamics of the national currency and foreign remittances of individuals (Pontarollo & Mendieta Munoz, 2018); form of administrative-territorial structure and methods of regional management (Pink-Harper, 2018). We also note the significant interest of researchers in the processes of economic growth in developing countries, such as Liberia, Egypt, Pakistan, Vietnam, Ecuador and other Latin American countries (Khan et al, 2018;Roquez-Diaz & Escot, 2018;Baloch et al, 2018;Bunte et al, 2018;Ibrahiem, 2018;Maune, 2018;Nguyen & Pham, 2018;Pontarollo & Mendieta Munoz, 2018). Worth to be noted works that a devoted topost-socialist country of Eastern Europe, such as Slovakia, Slovenia, Poland, Lithuania, Czech Republic (Mahmood & Ahmad, 2018;Raisová, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CPTPP is an expansion of the existing free trade agreement between Brunei, Chile, New Zealand, and Singapore. Currently, CPTPP is negotiated between 11 economies, including the existing four economies plus Australia, Canada, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Peru, and Vietnam (Khan et al, 2018).…”
Section: Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-pacific Partnership Free Trade Agreementmentioning
confidence: 99%