1985
DOI: 10.1093/jee/78.3.535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic Implications of a Regional Uniform Planting Date Cotton Production System: Texas Rolling Plains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results of this study support these previous reports, but also suggest opportunity to reduce overwintering boll weevil populations through delayed planting of cotton. This tactic has been used successfully in other regions of Texas (Masud et al 1985, Fuchs et al 1998, and, based on seasonal patterns of survival observed in this study, could provide substantial benefits to boll weevil eradication efforts currently being conducted in the Lower Rio Grande Valley.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Results of this study support these previous reports, but also suggest opportunity to reduce overwintering boll weevil populations through delayed planting of cotton. This tactic has been used successfully in other regions of Texas (Masud et al 1985, Fuchs et al 1998, and, based on seasonal patterns of survival observed in this study, could provide substantial benefits to boll weevil eradication efforts currently being conducted in the Lower Rio Grande Valley.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Based on detailed studies of boll weevil diapause and overwinter survival (Rummel and Adkisson 1970, White and Rummel 1978, Slosser 1978, Rummel and Carrol 1985, a uniform delayed planting strategy was developed in the Texas Rolling Plains as a means to maximize suicidal emergence of postdiapause weevils (Slosser 1978). During the past decade, this program has significantly reduced losses to boll weevil and substantially increased the profitability of cotton production in the region (Walker 1984, Masud et al 1984. Several workers have suggested that a similar program of uniform delayed planting might effectively suppress damage by pink bollworm in the southwestern United States (Adkisson et al 1962).…”
Section: Agronomic Practices Planting Datementioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the past two decades, regional control programs for cotton pests have been implemented in several areas of the United States (Henneberry et al, in press). The more important of these include the Heliothis Management Program in Arkansas (Phillips and Nicholson 1979) and several management or eradication programs for boll weevil (Davich 1976, Andrews 1981, Hamer et al 1983, Masud et al 1984, Farr and Lane 1987, Summy et al 1988a, Brazzel 1989). Operational differences notwithstanding, these programs share one common denominator, i.e., the objective of obtaining effective control through an orga¬ nized and concerted attack on the pest population, rather than individual infestations.…”
Section: Regional Pest Control Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important that the policy variable be constant in sign and the nearer the upper and lower bounds of parameters over many specifications, the more confident one can be about inferences made from results. A recent study by Masud et al, 1985b, used this method to evaluate economic implications of a regional uniform planting date (UPD) cotton production sys- tem on the Texas Rolling Plains and mainly concentrated on the UPD variable.…”
Section: Cotton Yield Response Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%